1981
DOI: 10.1016/0038-092x(81)90076-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-linear flat-plate collector model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The elimination of Qu(β) implied that (To − Ti) = 0, which caused the absorber plate not to have significant temperature changes through the raising tubes. Also, the Joule effect controlled by PID allows us to achieve lower uncertainty, but in Case 1 the greatest contribution of uncertainty continues to be the uncertainty of Figure 7 shows a comparison of UL(β)/UL(90°) vs. β for Case 1 (Qu(β) > 0), considering that Ut ≈ UL, according Duffie and Beckman [3] and Cooper et al [8], to calculate Ut. The Hollands correlation [23] was used to calculate the Nussetl number in both methods.…”
Section: Effect Of the Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The elimination of Qu(β) implied that (To − Ti) = 0, which caused the absorber plate not to have significant temperature changes through the raising tubes. Also, the Joule effect controlled by PID allows us to achieve lower uncertainty, but in Case 1 the greatest contribution of uncertainty continues to be the uncertainty of Figure 7 shows a comparison of UL(β)/UL(90°) vs. β for Case 1 (Qu(β) > 0), considering that Ut ≈ UL, according Duffie and Beckman [3] and Cooper et al [8], to calculate Ut. The Hollands correlation [23] was used to calculate the Nussetl number in both methods.…”
Section: Effect Of the Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The U L (0) could only be increased up to 1.8% of the value of U L (90), from the highest to lowest values of (T i − T a )/G at β = 0. Figure 7 shows a comparison of UL(β)/UL(90°) vs. β for Case 1 (Qu(β) > 0), considering that Ut ≈ UL, according Duffie and Beckman [3] and Cooper et al [8], to calculate Ut. The Hollands correlation [23] was used to calculate the Nussetl number in both methods.…”
Section: Effect Of the Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pflug et al [78] extended the standard efficiency curve of Cooper and Dunkle [79] to account also for the losses to the building interior. A comparison with a validated detailed physical BIST model showed that the collector gain can be correctly calculated.…”
Section: Bi Solar Thermalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the equivalent heat transfer coefficient between the plate and the cover, h p-c , was calculated for β = 0° and compared to Hollands & Buchberg solutions, respectively, [22][23][24]. The function of the overall heat loss coefficient, U L , was examined and compared to the Cooper and Dunkle assumption [25,26]. Moreover, the collector's operation was examined not only in horizontal position but also for 15°, 30°, and 45° inclination angle for 30 °C inlet water temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%