2014 International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/spin.2014.6776932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-iterative adaptive median filter for image denoising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bhateja et al [20] proposed a method similar to [19]; however, the maximum allowable size of window became 9 × 9. If 9 × 9 window surrounding noisy pixel does not have any known noise-free pixel, it replaces the noisy pixel with previously processed or previous noise-free pixel.…”
Section: <mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bhateja et al [20] proposed a method similar to [19]; however, the maximum allowable size of window became 9 × 9. If 9 × 9 window surrounding noisy pixel does not have any known noise-free pixel, it replaces the noisy pixel with previously processed or previous noise-free pixel.…”
Section: <mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance evaluation was made on the basis of comparison of peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and mean structural similarity (MSSIM) of adaptive DWMF with methods proposed by adaptive median filter (AMF), adaptive weighted median filter (AWMF), Ibrahim et al [19] (AdFuz), Bhadouria [21], and Bhateja et al [20]. [20]. e SAMF.…”
Section: Statistics Calculation For Adaptive Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Internal denoising algorithms use larger patches and search-windows at higher noise levels [13][14][15][16], improving reconstructed quality. Extensions to the NLM algorithm proposed adaptive spatial support for superior results, by classifying patches as textured or smooth by edge-detection and morphological operations [17], or by clustering the SVD (singular-value decomposition) of the blocks' gradient fields [18], allowing spatial adaptation for each block.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to improve quality of ultrasound images is to suppress speckle noise without affecting important features and texture of the image. Therefore, previous studies have attempted to address the challenges by proposing restoration and enhancement methods [1], [8]- [14]. And, the classical noise-suppressing frameworks for multilicative noise removal are total variation [15]- [23] wavelet [24]- [31] and linear/nonlinear diffusion [9], [32]- [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%