2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-invasive preferential root distribution analysis methodology from a slope stability approach

Abstract: Asymmetric root distribution pattern on steep terrain is analysed by combining GPR(Ground Penetrating Radar) image analysis with a theoretical root distribution model and is verified with field investigation data. Root distribution and morphology of a mature deciduous tree were analysed in terms of the plant's anchorage needs in an asymmetric loading condition scenario. The GPR method was combined with trench profile and root excavation techniques for both the structural and non-structural root data collection… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4). This is consistent with VRDs reported for shrub, woody, and herbaceous plant species in Mediterranean (Preti et al, 2010;Tron et al, 2014), southern alpine (Burylo et al, 2011) and temperate-humid ecosystems (Gonzalez-Ollauri and Mickovski, 2016;Tardio et al, 2016), and it confirms that the proposed approach for describing VRD in herbaceous plants is methodologically robust across terrestrial ecosystems in Europe.…”
Section: Empirical Vrd Model (Solid Lines) and With The Parametric Ecohydrological Vrd Model (Dotted Line) (D-e) Mathematical Relationshisupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4). This is consistent with VRDs reported for shrub, woody, and herbaceous plant species in Mediterranean (Preti et al, 2010;Tron et al, 2014), southern alpine (Burylo et al, 2011) and temperate-humid ecosystems (Gonzalez-Ollauri and Mickovski, 2016;Tardio et al, 2016), and it confirms that the proposed approach for describing VRD in herbaceous plants is methodologically robust across terrestrial ecosystems in Europe.…”
Section: Empirical Vrd Model (Solid Lines) and With The Parametric Ecohydrological Vrd Model (Dotted Line) (D-e) Mathematical Relationshisupporting
confidence: 87%
“…the pattern in which root density biomass is distributed along the soil profile -is perhaps the most important feature to know ability of these models to realistically portray VRD has been successfully tested for few herbaceous (Gonzalez-Ollauri and Mickovski, 2016) and shrub species (Preti and Giadrossich, 2009;Preti et al, 2010), but their application to the wider pool of plants, in general, and to woody plants (e.g. Preti et al, 2010;Tron et al, 2014;Tardio et al, 2016), in particular, needs further validation. In addition, the robustness of the model conceptualisation and the assumptions still need to be verified against primary data showing the influence of multiple soil and plant attributes on VRD, which could help to identify potential model improvements including application to climates with different ecohydrological features, such as tropical or alpine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil matric suction was monitored with two field tensiometers/piezometers (T4 -UMS GmbH, Germany) installed vertically within the soilroot zone (i.e. 0-500 mm beneath the soil surface; Gonzalez-Ollauri and Mickovski, 2017a; Tardio et al, 2016) and, at 0.1 m from the downslope side of the tree boles of Syc1 and Syc2.…”
Section: Quantification Of Stemflow and Funnelling Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation in elongation rates for various plants reflect the genetic difference among species as well as the effects of other factors such as root system architecture (Tardio et al, 2016). This is important for competition between species and for allowing one genotype to grow better than the other at a specific location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%