2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2008.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-invasive device to continuously determine heat strain in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
83
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…exercising individuals in warm-hot conditions. The earlier investigation, conducted at 33 and 40°C, revealed the insulation largely, but not completely, removed the ambient-to-skin thermal gradient, so an air-temperature bias was evident (Taylor et al, 1999), as confirmed by Gunga et al (2008). The strength of the correlation between sensor and oesophageal temperatures was site dependent, with the forehead being superior to the spine, followed by the wrist and jugular sites.…”
Section: Transcutaneous Temperaturementioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…exercising individuals in warm-hot conditions. The earlier investigation, conducted at 33 and 40°C, revealed the insulation largely, but not completely, removed the ambient-to-skin thermal gradient, so an air-temperature bias was evident (Taylor et al, 1999), as confirmed by Gunga et al (2008). The strength of the correlation between sensor and oesophageal temperatures was site dependent, with the forehead being superior to the spine, followed by the wrist and jugular sites.…”
Section: Transcutaneous Temperaturementioning
confidence: 88%
“…Another variation, developed to find a technically less-demanding and more robust method for field use, used clothing insulation and insulated-skin temperature measurements (Dollberg et al, 1993;Bogh et al, 1994;Taylor et al, 1999;Edwards et al, 2002;Armstrong, 2006;Gunga et al, 2008). Those studies yielded inconsistent outcomes that appeared linked to the quality of the thermal insulation and ambient conditions.…”
Section: Transcutaneous Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the difference in predicted T c by somatic forms was not as discrete as measured values. Based on 0.50°C as the criteria of a maximum acceptable error (Gunga et al 2008), the model predictions of individuals by somatic forms was overall close to the measured values, except for the prediction errors greater than 0.50°C in the 90th minute in data2.…”
Section: Model Validation By Somatic Formsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Overall, the model prediction errors were small and lean individuals were able to tolerate 30% longer in the heat stress than medium individuals. Using a criteria of RMSD=0.5°C as a maximum acceptable range (Gunga et al 2008), the model errors (RMSD) were acceptable within the criteria. Figure 4 compares mean T c predictions with mean measured T c of medium and lean groups.…”
Section: Model Validation By Somatic Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eine aktuelle Entwicklung zur nichtinvasiven Messung der KKT ist der sogenannte Doppelsensor. Dieser wird an der Stirn platziert und korreliert sehr gut mit der rektalen Temperaturmessung [5,6,7]. …”
Section: Homöothermieunclassified