2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2017.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-invasive and adaptive CAD system to detect brain tumor from T2-weighted MRIs using customized Otsu’s thresholding with prominent features and supervised learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher classification accurate feature is selected. Feature classification accuracy is 98% [14]. In this study, the nuclei based neural network classifies the tumor with the help of proposed features.…”
Section: Iirelated Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher classification accurate feature is selected. Feature classification accuracy is 98% [14]. In this study, the nuclei based neural network classifies the tumor with the help of proposed features.…”
Section: Iirelated Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detecting brain tumour in T2‐weighted brain MRI images was introduced by Gupta and Khanna [24], this method was examined using an adaptive and intrusive tumour analysis process. The method of Otsu's thresholding is done for segmentation, and MRI images are enhanced by the prepossessing technique.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 illustrates the comparison of classifier performance. The overall classification performance of proposed SVM–AEPO with the selected GLCM, and HWHT features is compared with different existing techniques local binary pattern‐Tamura‐SVM (LBP‐Tamura‐SVM) [24], Berkeley wavelet transformation‐SVM (BWT‐SVM) [37] and GLCM–SVM (GLCM) [22]. The accuracy of proposed SVM–AEPO is found 2% better than the GLCM–SVM.…”
Section: Experiments Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main objective of any CAD system is to have high accuracy rate and low processing time simultaneously. To attain these two performance parameters researchers club different existing traditional approaches like thresholding-based, 4 region-based, 5 and statistical-based 6 with emerging approaches such as machine learning-based, 7 and deep learning-based to achieve an optimum output. 8 The MR brain tumor modalities vary in tissue anatomy and structure based on the signals pulse parameters (repetition time and echo time).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%