2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-017-2335-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-enzymatic sensor for hydrogen peroxide based on the use of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles deposited on the surface of NiO nanosheets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Table I shows a comparison of H 2 O 2 sensing performance of the current modified electrode with those obtained using different metal oxide-based electrodes. 34,35,[69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] Compared to earlier reports, we observed that the as-fabricated Meso-C/ZnO electrocatalyst exhibited a competitive sensitivity, low detection limit and relatively wide detection range. Particularly for the LOD value, our fabricated electrode exhibited lower detection limit compared with previously modified electrodes, such as Co doped ZnO, 34 Cu 2 O and Cu 2 O/GNs, 73 Cu 2 O-rGO, 74 NiO/α-Fe 2 O 3 76 and PtSPE/ZnONPs.…”
Section: ( ) [ ] [ ] /contrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Table I shows a comparison of H 2 O 2 sensing performance of the current modified electrode with those obtained using different metal oxide-based electrodes. 34,35,[69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77] Compared to earlier reports, we observed that the as-fabricated Meso-C/ZnO electrocatalyst exhibited a competitive sensitivity, low detection limit and relatively wide detection range. Particularly for the LOD value, our fabricated electrode exhibited lower detection limit compared with previously modified electrodes, such as Co doped ZnO, 34 Cu 2 O and Cu 2 O/GNs, 73 Cu 2 O-rGO, 74 NiO/α-Fe 2 O 3 76 and PtSPE/ZnONPs.…”
Section: ( ) [ ] [ ] /contrasting
confidence: 79%
“…5 and the LOD value was estimated to be 5.18 μM with a linear detection range (LDR) is 0.5-9.5 mM. In summary, we can conclude that the newly fabricated sensor electrode demonstrated a wide range of H 2 O 2 detection with a rapid response of <10 s. The sensor efficiency in terms of sensitivity, LOD, and linear detection range (LDR) is acceptable compared to previously reported Fe 2 O 3 and Au nanoparticle-based non-enzymatic H 2 O 2 sensor electrodes 27,36,39,41,47,[59][60][61][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102] as depicted in Table II. The obtained data revealed that the LOD value of our proposed sensor electrode is better than some previously reported iron oxide nanostructures and AuNPs-based sensor electrodes such as α-Fe 2 O 3 , 102 3Dα-Fe 2 O 3 , 39 Pth/MWCNTs/{IOMN/Th}, 87 amorphous Fe 2 O 3 , 86 NiO/ α-Fe 2 O 3 , 100 40-46 nm PB/Fe 2 O 3 , 91 AuNPs-Psi, 27 rGO/AuNPs, 92 AuNPs-CESM, 97 and AuPd/C.…”
Section: Electrodementioning
confidence: 58%
“…The electrode's shape, size, and position in the channel produce a nonuniform electric field gradient [59]. Metals, for instance, gold (Au), silver (Ag), chromium (Cr), platinum (Pt), and titanium (Ti), are commonly used to implement electrode geometries [60][61][62]. Which includes planar [63,64], interdigitated [65,66], quadrupole [3], tapered [45,[67][68][69][70][71][72][73], rectangular [74], curved [75], and spiral electrodes [4,35].…”
Section: Dep Devices For Biological Fluid Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%