2002
DOI: 10.1051/m2an:2002021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non elliptic spectral problem related to the analysis of superconducting micro-strip lines

Abstract: Abstract. This paper is devoted to the spectral analysis of a non elliptic operator A, deriving from the study of superconducting micro-strip lines. Once a sufficient condition for the self-adjointness of operator A has been derived, we determine its continuous spectrum. Then, we show that A is unbounded from below and that it has a sequence of negative eigenvalues tending to −∞. Using the Min-Max principle, a characterization of its positive eigenvalues is given. Thanks to this characterization, some conditio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because σ δ changes sign on Ω, this spectrum is not bounded from below nor from above. More precisely, we have the following results (see [43] and [7]). Proposition 1.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because σ δ changes sign on Ω, this spectrum is not bounded from below nor from above. More precisely, we have the following results (see [43] and [7]). Proposition 1.2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In (7), each eigenvalue is repeated according to its multiplicity. On the other hand, if v n is an eigenfunction associated with the eigenvalue…”
Section: Far Field Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, (±iµ, φ) ∈ C × H 1 0 (0; π) are the same pairs as in (12) and χ is introduced with Figure 2 (let us remind that χ(ρ) = 0 for ρ ≤ 1 and χ(ρ) = 1 for ρ ≥ 2). Note that S ± ∈V 1 −1 (Ξ).…”
Section: Near Field Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.1.5], it suffices to exhibit a sequence (ξ m ) m of elements of D(A δ ) which satisfies lim m→+∞ (A δ ξ m , ξ m ) L 2 (Ω) = −∞ and ξ m L 2 (Ω) = 1. We proceed as in [12,Prop. 4.1].…”
Section: Proposition 21 Assume That the Contrastmentioning
confidence: 99%