2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88659-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-destructive sugar-feeding assay for parasite detection and estimating the extrinsic incubation period of Plasmodium falciparum in individual mosquito vectors

Abstract: Despite its epidemiological importance, the time Plasmodium parasites take to achieve development in the vector mosquito (the extrinsic incubation period, EIP) remains poorly characterized. A novel non-destructive assay designed to estimate EIP in single mosquitoes, and more broadly to study Plasmodium–Anopheles vectors interactions, is presented. The assay uses small pieces of cotton wool soaked in sugar solution to collect malaria sporozoites from individual mosquitoes during sugar feeding to monitor infecti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is made available under a preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 31, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.28.522076 doi: bioRxiv preprint thresholds. A consequence is that higher sporozoite loads are more likely to be detected so that our technique may have overestimated the extrinsic incubation time in mosquitoes carrying low sporozoite loads [43]. Thus, despite the observed trend, which remains non-significant and likely to be due to the expected technical bias, our results highlight that the EIP does not depend on the parasite density in the system tested here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…It is made available under a preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in The copyright holder for this this version posted December 31, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.28.522076 doi: bioRxiv preprint thresholds. A consequence is that higher sporozoite loads are more likely to be detected so that our technique may have overestimated the extrinsic incubation time in mosquitoes carrying low sporozoite loads [43]. Thus, despite the observed trend, which remains non-significant and likely to be due to the expected technical bias, our results highlight that the EIP does not depend on the parasite density in the system tested here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…gambiae and An. coluzzii were obtained from an outbred colony established [ 15 ] in 2015 and 2016, respectively, and routinely identified by conventional PCR assays [ 16 ]. These two Anopheles species were repeatedly replenished with F 1 s from wild-caught female mosquitoes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the daily frequency of mosquito sugar feeding at 27 °C (i.e. about 75% [ 26 ]) by 2–3 days, all mosquitoes would have acquired their sugar meal treatment at least once. Male and female mosquitoes were kept together to ensure insemination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oocyst rupture in the mosquito midgut and sporozoite invasion of salivary glands are highly asynchronous. While some oocysts are intact and keep developing on 9–12 dpbm, others have already ruptured and released their sporozoites [ 26 , 27 ]. To explore possible differences in the timing of sporozoite dissemination in mosquito salivary glands between ricinine-fed and control females, three metrics were measured [ 26 , 27 ]: The proportion of infected mosquitoes with ruptured oocysts on 10–12 dpbm; the number of mosquitoes with at least one ruptured oocyst in their midguts out of the total number of infected mosquitoes (i.e.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%