2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.07.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-destructive estimation of chlorophyll-a and -b over different crops using airborne imaging spectroscopy observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results (R 2 > 0.90) indicated that the model could be employed in most analysis applications, including quality control. The results of this study were better than the research of [23] with R²C 0.46 by utilizing aerial imaging spectroscopy with a chlorophyll with a peak wavelength of 672 nm on some crops, such as beans, sugarcane, jowar, Bengal gram, maize, wheat. As shown in Figure 2, the regression coefficient values are derived from the PLSR analysis modeled using the pre-processing Savitzky-Golay's 1st derivative technique.…”
Section: The Performance Model Of Chlorophyll a Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results (R 2 > 0.90) indicated that the model could be employed in most analysis applications, including quality control. The results of this study were better than the research of [23] with R²C 0.46 by utilizing aerial imaging spectroscopy with a chlorophyll with a peak wavelength of 672 nm on some crops, such as beans, sugarcane, jowar, Bengal gram, maize, wheat. As shown in Figure 2, the regression coefficient values are derived from the PLSR analysis modeled using the pre-processing Savitzky-Golay's 1st derivative technique.…”
Section: The Performance Model Of Chlorophyll a Accumulationmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The performance model of chlorophyll b accumulation The results of PLSR calibration, validation, and prediction performance of Chlorophyll b Content of Red and Green Spinach Microgreens are shown in Table 3. The best R 2 C findings (with the closest value to 1) are 0.813, with RMSEC values of 0.979 yielded by Standard Normal Variance (SNV) as a preprocessing technique.The of this study are superior to studies by[23] on crops that utilize aerial imaging spectroscopy with an R 2 C value of 0.51 and a peak at 587 nm. R 2 is between 0.66 to 0.81, indicating that the generated model is acceptable for screening and other approximate calibrations[25]…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Additionally, the transfer of nitrogen between leaf layers during different growth stages and fertilization treatments further amplifies the spatiotemporal variability of LCC within the canopy. While current models can predict crop CCC to some extent ( Huang et al., 2022 ; Kushwaha et al., 2022 ), they often overlook the heterogeneity of LCC distribution in the vertical space, resulting in significant errors during practical application ( Winterhalter et al., 2012 ). Hence, the incorporation of vertical distribution characteristics of LCC into the maize chlorophyll content model is pivotal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%