2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11801-014-4047-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non-contact gear measurement method based on laser vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above traditional image matching methods based on SIFT [11][12] , SURF [13][14][15] , BRIEF [16][17] , and ORB [18][19][20] all rely on manually designed descriptors. Although they have certain effects, considering the on-site environment of the intelligent sorting robot for coal gangue, there are still some shortcomings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above traditional image matching methods based on SIFT [11][12] , SURF [13][14][15] , BRIEF [16][17] , and ORB [18][19][20] all rely on manually designed descriptors. Although they have certain effects, considering the on-site environment of the intelligent sorting robot for coal gangue, there are still some shortcomings.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results showed that the size measurement error is less than 0.04 mm. Song et al 7 studied a binocular vision measurement method based on improved FAST and BRIEF. They matched the feature points through FAST and BRIEF, mapped the feature points to the world coordinate system based on binocular vision, and calculated the size according to the feature points in the world coordinate system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the problems above, scholars have conducted a series of studies and explorations to improve the accuracy of optical measurements of gears. Song et al [3] developed a laser vision-based non-contact gear measurement system and proposed a laser vision precision measurement method (LVPMM) to ensure accuracy. The experimental results indicated that gear measurement uncertainty was 2.1 μm and the maximum helical deviation was 35 μm, which meets industrial class II measurement requirements (and below) for standard gears.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%