2012
DOI: 10.1002/fld.3748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A non‐conforming least‐squares finite element method for incompressible fluid flow problems

Abstract: SUMMARYIn this paper, we develop least‐squares finite element methods (LSFEMs) for incompressible fluid flows with improved mass conservation. Specifically, we formulate a new locally conservative LSFEM for the velocity–vorticity–pressure Stokes system, which uses a piecewise divergence‐free basis for the velocity and standard C0 elements for the vorticity and the pressure. The new method, which we term dV‐VP improves upon our previous discontinuous stream‐function formulation in several ways. The use of a vel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uniqueness of the solution to (7) instantly follows from Lemma 1 and the trivial boundedness of a h (·; ·). Further, it is direct to derive the error estimate with respect to the norms · u and · p by the approximation properties of spaces V m h and W m h [26, Theorem 4.1].…”
Section: M3 [Inverse Inequality]mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The uniqueness of the solution to (7) instantly follows from Lemma 1 and the trivial boundedness of a h (·; ·). Further, it is direct to derive the error estimate with respect to the norms · u and · p by the approximation properties of spaces V m h and W m h [26, Theorem 4.1].…”
Section: M3 [Inverse Inequality]mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The least squares finite element method (LSFEM) is a sophisticated technique for solving the partial differential equation. For second-order elliptic problems, we refer to [11,18,12,24,4], for the Navier-Stokes problem, we refer to [9,7,13]. For an overview of the least squares finite element methods, we refer to [10] and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remark that, there have been various approaches utilised in regard to the conditions, such as the discontinuous Galerkin methods [24,[28][29][30], the isogeometric methods [33][34][35], the least square finite element methods [11,14,26,43], finite element methods with enhanced stabilisation [9,13,23,25,62], the element free Galerkin method [10,67], stabilised finite element with postprocessing [8], and the NURBS method [6,50]. They provide various approaches to construct a divergence-free velocity field for Stokes problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i.e., they specify only the first of the two velocity conditions in (3). Thus far, achieving both stability and exact mass conservation with the velocity boundary condition has been only possible by switching to a non-conforming formulations such as the discontinuous LSFEMs in [8] and [9], or by employing Lagrange multipliers to enforce mass conservation [15]. Of course the latter negates some of the attractive properties of least-squares methods such as symmetric and positive definite algebraic systems, while the former requires careful selection of mesh-dependent weights for the various jump terms and can result in higher condition numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%