2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-010-9319-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Non-Adiabatic Flamelet Progress–Variable Approach for LES of Turbulent Premixed Flames

Abstract: A progress variable/flame surface density/probability density function method has been employed for a Large Eddy Simulation of a CH 4 /Air turbulent premixed bluff body flame. In particular, both mean and variance of the progress variable are transported and subgrid spatially filtered gradient contributes to model the flame surface density (that introduces the effect of the subgrid flame reaction zone) and to presume a probability density function (that introduces the effect of subgrid fluctuations on chemistr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For non-adiabatic conditions, several flamelets at different enthalpy levels are determined by the solution of burner stabilized one-dimensional laminar premixed flame simulations with varying mass flow rate [3, 37, 38]. The flamelets are parametrized in terms of the normalized enthalpy scalar i as defined in Section 2.1.3.…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For non-adiabatic conditions, several flamelets at different enthalpy levels are determined by the solution of burner stabilized one-dimensional laminar premixed flame simulations with varying mass flow rate [3, 37, 38]. The flamelets are parametrized in terms of the normalized enthalpy scalar i as defined in Section 2.1.3.…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For such cases, several flamelets at different enthalpy levels are required in order to accurately describe the combustion process [34]. Two different approaches can be chosen for the creation of the flamelets at reduced enthalpy: either the inlet temperature is reduced using a freely propagating flame configuration or the conductive heat losses at the burner inlet are increased by a reduced mass flow rate using a burner stabilized calculation.…”
Section: Heat Loss Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular for rocket applications, modeling these reactions is especially critical in hydrocarbon combustion, where the chemical time-scales are lower than in the case of hydrogen/oxygen chemistry. Efforts to model the influence of non-adiabatic effects on the gas composition, the associ-ated heat release and expected wall heat loads have been carried out using flamelet methods [4][5][6][7][8]. Studies aiming at quantifying the importance of the recombination reactions on heat loads augmentation have been carried out by considering methane/oxygen mixtures in rocket combustion chambers [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%