2003
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nomenclature for restriction enzymes, DNA methyltransferases, homing endonucleases and their genes

Abstract: A nomenclature is described for restriction endonucleases, DNA methyltransferases, homing endonucleases and related genes and gene products. It provides explicit categories for the many different Type II enzymes now identified and provides a system for naming the putative genes found by sequence analysis of microbial genomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
502
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 639 publications
(506 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
502
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The AloI (13), PpiI, and TstI REases used in this study are classified as type IIB REases because of their characteristic cleavage of DNA on both sides of the recognition sequence (2). Type IIB REases are bifunctional enzymes, which either cleave or methylate DNA, depending on the nature of cofactors added.…”
Section: Characterization Of Reases Used For Domain-swapping Experimementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The AloI (13), PpiI, and TstI REases used in this study are classified as type IIB REases because of their characteristic cleavage of DNA on both sides of the recognition sequence (2). Type IIB REases are bifunctional enzymes, which either cleave or methylate DNA, depending on the nature of cofactors added.…”
Section: Characterization Of Reases Used For Domain-swapping Experimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three main groups of restriction enzymes (types I, II, and III), which differ in enzyme composition, cofactor requirements, and mode of action (2). The beststudied are type II REases, which in general recognize specific DNA targets of 4-8 bp and cleave DNA at or close to these sequences (1,2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent investigations of this phenomenon by Arber, Meselson and co‐workers led to the discovery of restriction‐modification (R‐M) systems, a landmark event in the history of molecular biology 4, 5. While much subsequent work focused on characterizing restriction enzymes as tools for recombinant DNA technology, the biology and biochemistry of the R‐M systems proved to be interesting in their own right 6, 7, 8. These systems are the most widespread prokaryotic biological conflict systems facilitating both discrimination of cellular “self” DNA from invasive “non‐self” DNA and destruction of the latter 6, 9, 10, 11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A). In classic R‐M systems, modification of DNA serves as the discriminatory tag, which prevents the restriction of self DNA, while allowing the non‐self DNA, which is not modified, to be targeted 8, 10. Several bacteriophages have evolved counter‐strategies against R‐M systems in the form of DNA modifications generated by enzymes encoded in their genomes, which inhibit restriction enzymes 10, 22, 23.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restriction endonucleases (REases) 1 provide an anti-viral protection for bacteria by degrading the foreign DNA of invading bacteriophages. The enzymes recognize specific nucleotide sequences and cleave both strands of DNA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%