2005
DOI: 10.1093/ietfec/e88-a.4.855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Noise Reduction Method Based on Linear Prediction with Variable Step-Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many speech enhancement methods have been established in decades [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. These speech enhancement techniques can be classified to time domain methods and spectral domain methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many speech enhancement methods have been established in decades [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. These speech enhancement techniques can be classified to time domain methods and spectral domain methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By avoiding the conception of a generation model of speech signal (AR model), it was shown in [4] that the proposed algorithm had better performance than the conventional methods [2,3] with re spect to noise suppression capability. However, since this algo rithm requires the calculation of inverse matrix, and its compu tation complexity is much accompanied with the increment of the size of state vector/matrix, the reduction of the computational com plexity is substantially required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], we have already proposed a simple and robust noise suppression algorithm using only the Kalman filter theory. By avoiding the conception of a generation model of speech signal (AR model), it was shown in [7] that the proposed algorithm had better performance than the conventional method [4], [6] with respect to noise suppression capability. However, since this algorithm requires the calculation of inverse matrix, the conventional method requires high computational complexity by increasing the vector/matrix size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%