2008
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A noise model for mass spectrometry based proteomics

Abstract: We find that the noise in Q-TOF data from Applied Biosystems QSTAR fits well to a combination of multinomial and Poisson model with detector dead-time correction. In comparison, ion trap noise from Agilent MSD-Trap-SL is larger than the Q-TOF noise and is proportional to Poisson noise. We then demonstrate that the noise model can be used to improve deisotoping for peptide detection, by estimating appropriate cutoffs of the goodness of fit parameter at prescribed error rates. The noise models also have implicat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also developed a robust error model that allows estimation of p value, q value, and confidence interval on any measured iTRAQ ratio from a single experiment. Our approach represents a paradigm shift relative to previous methodologies for quantitative proteomics in that we derive a parametric error model from a large number of weak variance estimates (49), all within a single acquisition, rather than extensive, empirical characterization of individual mass spectrometry peaks (20,33,34,50). The ability of our model, developed herein for LC-MS/MS analysis of iTRAQ-labeled peptides on an Orbitrap, to provide improved estimates of precision for data acquired some two decades ago on small molecules ionized by electron impact and analyzed in MS mode on an FT/ICR mass spectrometer strongly supports the validity of our approach.…”
Section: Direct Comparison Of Constitutively Active Flt3 Mutants Suggmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also developed a robust error model that allows estimation of p value, q value, and confidence interval on any measured iTRAQ ratio from a single experiment. Our approach represents a paradigm shift relative to previous methodologies for quantitative proteomics in that we derive a parametric error model from a large number of weak variance estimates (49), all within a single acquisition, rather than extensive, empirical characterization of individual mass spectrometry peaks (20,33,34,50). The ability of our model, developed herein for LC-MS/MS analysis of iTRAQ-labeled peptides on an Orbitrap, to provide improved estimates of precision for data acquired some two decades ago on small molecules ionized by electron impact and analyzed in MS mode on an FT/ICR mass spectrometer strongly supports the validity of our approach.…”
Section: Direct Comparison Of Constitutively Active Flt3 Mutants Suggmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore model the noise contamination with multiplicative noise, which standard deviation is proportional to the value of eacg signal coefficient. Numerous studies have come to similar conclusions [12], [13]. Considering that the noise is a mixture of an additive component and a multiplicative component yields the following model for the standard deviation of the noise on each coefficient of the data:…”
Section: B About the Noise Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Zooming on the main peak of the previous figure yields Fig. 2b, where a small peak is visible at +1Da, which is typical of the presence of carbon-13 13 C. This figure also highlights the large range of intensities which must be extracted from the data. In practice, the main peak has a width of about ten samples, showing the extreme precision of the Orbitrap spectrometer which was used for the acquisition of these data.…”
Section: A Mass and Elution Profilesmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Some types of mass spectrometry have Poisson-distributed noise as well, although the noise distribution is often complex; while this model may be a suitable estimate of the noise in mass spectrometry, this would have to be investigated further. [5] The focus of the smoothing method presented in this article is on Raman spectroscopy, since the authors have ready access to an FT-Raman system, but, as noted above, the method is believed to be applicable to other spectroscopic techniques as well. Raman spectra contain noise contributions that are both homoscedastic (noise is independent of the signal intensity) and heteroscedastic (the noise is dependent on the signal intensity).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%