2011
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2011/12/015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A no-go for no-go theorems prohibiting cosmic acceleration in extra dimensional models

Abstract: A four-dimensional effective theory that arises as the low-energy limit of some extra-dimensional model is constrained by the higher dimensional Einstein equations. Steinhardt & Wesley use this to show that accelerated expansion in our four large dimensions can only be transient in a large class of Kaluza-Klein models that satisfy the (higher dimensional) null energy condition [1]. We point out that these no-go theorems are based on a rather ad-hoc assumption on the metric, without which no strong statements c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we are interested primarily in 4-dimensional dS space, [3,4] are interested more generally in accelerating cosmologies with a more general time-dependence, and specifically require integration over the internal dimensions in order to draw conclusions. A list of assumptions necessary to derive the results of [4] are conveniently summarized in [5]; in Table I, we briefly review some of the assumptions from [1,2] and [4] and how they compare to our assumptions. We see in general that our constraint requires fewer assumptions than previous no-gos.…”
Section: Yes Yes Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While we are interested primarily in 4-dimensional dS space, [3,4] are interested more generally in accelerating cosmologies with a more general time-dependence, and specifically require integration over the internal dimensions in order to draw conclusions. A list of assumptions necessary to derive the results of [4] are conveniently summarized in [5]; in Table I, we briefly review some of the assumptions from [1,2] and [4] and how they compare to our assumptions. We see in general that our constraint requires fewer assumptions than previous no-gos.…”
Section: Yes Yes Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, there are a number of "no-go" theorems that detail how the matter content of the higher dimensional theory must violate an energy condition in the extra dimensions in order to obtain 4-dimensional dS [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Some separate related lines of investigation have been concerned with whether dS space can be explicitly realized in compactifications of string theory [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], see also [22][23][24], as well as the consistency of the model known as KKLT [25] as in [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the assumptions are the same, so that only the equivalence of ( 3) with ( 21) must be justified. And this follows from the analysis in subsection 3.3, specifically from expression (20) (times f 4 ), which gives immediately the lefthand side of ( 21) together with the following straightforward calculation for the remaining term in (20), containing derivatives of f along γ, on using ( 19)…”
Section: The Singularity Theorems Adapted To Warped Productsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, in [33] how accelerated expansion imposes strong constraints on compact extra dimensions was discussed, implying either (i) that both the gravitational constant G and the equation of state parameter w depend on time, or (ii) violation of the null convergence condition (1) in an inhomogenous way across the extra dimensions together with a sinchronyzed variation with the observable matter and "dark energy". Their conclusions were nevertheless criticized in [20], where one can find references to many other no-go and instability theorems [20].…”
Section: Other Argumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation