Robotic Welding, Intelligence and Automation
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73374-4_59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Wafer Prealigner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method for calculating the shape center of wafer is called the least minimum square method. However, because the roundness tolerance of the 10-inch wafer is^0.1 mm, and also the data of positioning notch needs processing individually, the taken method is not the least minimum square one, but a way based on the mass center (Song et al, 2006;Ziger, 2002;Beaulieu, 1987;Fu et al, 2007). As shown in Figure 4, the data acquisition card synchronously collects the digital signals from the reflection-style laser sensor trigged by the pulse of the rotated table encoder.…”
Section: The Prealigning Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method for calculating the shape center of wafer is called the least minimum square method. However, because the roundness tolerance of the 10-inch wafer is^0.1 mm, and also the data of positioning notch needs processing individually, the taken method is not the least minimum square one, but a way based on the mass center (Song et al, 2006;Ziger, 2002;Beaulieu, 1987;Fu et al, 2007). As shown in Figure 4, the data acquisition card synchronously collects the digital signals from the reflection-style laser sensor trigged by the pulse of the rotated table encoder.…”
Section: The Prealigning Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method for calculating the shape center of wafer is called the least minimum square method. However, because the roundness tolerance of the 10‐inch wafer is ±0.1 mm, and also the data of positioning notch needs processing individually, the taken method is not the least minimum square one, but a way based on the mass center (Song et al , 2006; Ziger, 2002; Beaulieu, 1987; Fu et al , 2007).…”
Section: The Prealigning Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%