“…95 % of the ZTDs have a formal error below 2.6 mm and 99.9 % of them have a formal error below 4.4 mm. This is somewhat better than in Byun and Bar-Sever (2009) 8-2,99 3,2-3,39 3,6-3,79 4-4,19 4,4-4,59 4,8-4,99 5,2-5,39 5,6-5,79 6-6,19 6,4-6,59 6,8-6,99 7,2-7,39 7,6-7,79 8-8,19 8,4-8,59 8,8-8,99 9,2-9,39 9,6-9,79 10-10,19 Percentage analysed a subset of 30 globally distributed IGS stations during 2003 and found a formal error between 1.5 and 5 mm of ZTD. Of course, this formal error does not take into account systematic errors (e.g.…”