2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2016.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new two-stage multiple comparison procedure for comparing several exponential populations with a control under heteroscedasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), which are different from the one given in Theorem 1 so that the design constant in Maurya et al [10] is different from ours.…”
Section: Sample Size Determination For the Two-stage Multiple Compari...contrasting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…), which are different from the one given in Theorem 1 so that the design constant in Maurya et al [10] is different from ours.…”
Section: Sample Size Determination For the Two-stage Multiple Compari...contrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Using these values, we yield ϕ(m, P * , γ) = 1 h t +g γ = 1 3.1273+ 3.1273 = 0.1599 and then the design constant is determined as c = δϕ(m, P * , γ) = 0.3(0.1599) = 0.04797. The values of h t and g γ in Maurya et al [10] are…”
Section: Sample Size Determination For the Two-stage Multiple Compari...mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation