2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2941442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Two-Stage Approach for a Bi-Objective Facility Layout Problem Considering Input/ Output Points Under Fuzzy Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tate and Smith [54] proposed a way to integrate material flow reduction and a penalization for solutions that have those undesirable "stretched" facilities. Thus, it is needed for each facility to have associated a shape constraint, let it be maximum aspect ratio allowed α (see Equations (3) and (4)) or minimum side length (minSide), that determines when a facility is feasible or not. So, if a plant layout is composed of facilities that do not fulfill their shape constraint, its fitness value equals to the material flow value plus a penalty value proportional to the number of unfeasible facilities.…”
Section: A Specific Ua-flp Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tate and Smith [54] proposed a way to integrate material flow reduction and a penalization for solutions that have those undesirable "stretched" facilities. Thus, it is needed for each facility to have associated a shape constraint, let it be maximum aspect ratio allowed α (see Equations (3) and (4)) or minimum side length (minSide), that determines when a facility is feasible or not. So, if a plant layout is composed of facilities that do not fulfill their shape constraint, its fitness value equals to the material flow value plus a penalty value proportional to the number of unfeasible facilities.…”
Section: A Specific Ua-flp Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the facilities layout planning objectives are the minimization of materials handling costs, optimize the use of labor, or improve workers' safety, among others. Material handling costs can account for 20% to 50% of a company budget, so an efficient arrangement of departments can reduce production costs substantially [2], [3]. Moreover, other possible constraints could be: a pair of departments should be near or adjacent to each other due to material handling; a pair of departments need to be far from each other, due to safety, health, or hygiene reasons, among others; a specific department has to be in a specific position due to aesthetic, production logic, federal regulations, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have presented additional approaches to manufacturing case studies. For example, Mohamadi et al [16] proposed an optimization algorithm to minimize the distances between facilities and dead space, using a model to obtain information from expert opinions. Due to the complexity considered, they used two metaheuristic algorithms, including PSO and Gas.…”
Section: Facility Layout Design With Simulation-based Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although researchers pay attention to assessing the structure of production systems, a path choice among multiple schemes -obtained by different optimized algorithms -has not been given much consideration yet. Manufacturing organizations frequently deal with the unavailability of manufacturing pattern with restrictive and partial fixes instead of carrying out costly and tedious system redesign [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%