2018
DOI: 10.12659/msm.905197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Triage Method for Burn Disasters: Fast Triage in Burns (FTB)

Abstract: BackgroundThere are few triage methods based on patient age and extent of burn. However, in case of mass casualties, age might be hard to define. Burn segregation in mass-casualty accidents requires an easy, fast, and effective method. Triage in burns should also segregate casualties requiring treatment in burn centers. The aim of this study was to create a proprietary segregation algorithm dedicated to mass-casualty incidents.Material/MethodsA retrospective analysis of 939 burned patients admitted to the Clin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our research confirmed that the GCS, which principally assesses brain damage, might not be appropriate to assess trauma severity because of its poor correlation with the NISS (correlation coefficient was −0.511) [ 41 ]. A study of 939 burn patients showed that a deeper burn (OR=1.1, P <0.001) was a latent predictor of burn severity [ 19 ] but was less useful as a predictor of the outcomes of mass burn casualties because such incidents also involve many non-burn and non-inhalation injury patients. Other factors, such as vital signs [ 16 ], which previously had been considered relevant to burn and trauma, were shown to have no significant correlations with injury severity in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, our research confirmed that the GCS, which principally assesses brain damage, might not be appropriate to assess trauma severity because of its poor correlation with the NISS (correlation coefficient was −0.511) [ 41 ]. A study of 939 burn patients showed that a deeper burn (OR=1.1, P <0.001) was a latent predictor of burn severity [ 19 ] but was less useful as a predictor of the outcomes of mass burn casualties because such incidents also involve many non-burn and non-inhalation injury patients. Other factors, such as vital signs [ 16 ], which previously had been considered relevant to burn and trauma, were shown to have no significant correlations with injury severity in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two trained medical experts independently reviewed the medical records and collected data using a standardized reporting template with clear definitions and codes. The patients’ vital signs evaluated at the time of admission to the hospitals were extracted [ 19 ], including systolic blood pressure (SBP), heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and body temperature. The shock index was calculated as the HR divided by SBP [ 16 ], and a high risk of shock was defined as a shock index ≥1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An appropriate treatment strategy is selected based on the assessment of burn depth [ 6 , 7 ]. Clinically, burns can be divided into superficial, which are treated conservatively, and deep burn wounds requiring surgical therapy [ 8 , 9 ]. An overly aggressive strategy of treatment for superficial burns will cause unnecessary damage to healthy tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%