The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.1541/ieejpes.124.347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Training Method for Analyzable Structured Neural Network and Application of Daily Peak Load Forecasting

Abstract: This paper presents a daily peak load forecasting method using an analyzable structured neural network (ASNN) in order to explain forecasting reasons. In this paper, we propose a new training method for ASNN in order to explain forecasting reason more properly than the conventional training method. ASNN consists of two types of hidden units. One type of hidden units has connecting weights between the hidden units and only one group of related input units. Another one has connecting weights between the hidden u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 and 11, the electric load prediction was performed well by the prediction method proposed in this paper. [6], the prediction error is 2.83% under the proposed method as compared to a prediction error of 2.53% for MEP, and although this error is 0.3% lower, it is within the prediction error of 3% for which electric power companies strive, so that the proposed method can be considered a good prediction method. However, the  ∞ filter gives more precise results for the MEB prediction on average when looking at the predictions for 30 days in Fig.…”
Section: Predictions Resulting From Filter Differencesmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…10 and 11, the electric load prediction was performed well by the prediction method proposed in this paper. [6], the prediction error is 2.83% under the proposed method as compared to a prediction error of 2.53% for MEP, and although this error is 0.3% lower, it is within the prediction error of 3% for which electric power companies strive, so that the proposed method can be considered a good prediction method. However, the  ∞ filter gives more precise results for the MEB prediction on average when looking at the predictions for 30 days in Fig.…”
Section: Predictions Resulting From Filter Differencesmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In performing parameter estimation, we used the data for the past 30 days from the prediction start date as the past data for the simulations. [6]. In this paper, we use data for the 30 days before the prediction day, taking into consideration past data and the load difference due to season.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations