1935
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0140273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Toxicant Occurring Naturally in Certain Samples of Plant Foodstuffs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1936
1936
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar damaging effect was reported by Franke and Tully (1935) and Franke et al (1936) in chickens and by Carlson et al (1951) in turkeys. Se alone to the diet reduced hatchability and also caused a high percentage of deformed embryos compared to the control (Tables 4, 5 and 6).…”
Section: Fertility and Hatchabilitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…A similar damaging effect was reported by Franke and Tully (1935) and Franke et al (1936) in chickens and by Carlson et al (1951) in turkeys. Se alone to the diet reduced hatchability and also caused a high percentage of deformed embryos compared to the control (Tables 4, 5 and 6).…”
Section: Fertility and Hatchabilitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Historically, reproductive problems have been associated with excess selenium since the 1930s when chickens that consumed grain grown on seleniferous soil had poor hatching success and embryos exhibited multiple malformations of the extremities (Franke and Tully, 1935). However, until recently there has been virtually no documenta- tion on the effects of excess selenium intake by natural populations of wild aquatic birds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The toxic effects of selenium were first described in South Dakota (USA), where chickens (Gallus domesticus) were observed to have poor reproductive success as a result of chick teratogenesis and mortality when fed grains from specific sources [1]. Subsequent studies identified elevated selenium content in the grains as the cause of the observed effects [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%