2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04149.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new tool for analysis of root growth in the spatio‐temporal continuum

Abstract: Summary• Quantification of overall growth and local growth zones in root system development is key to understanding the biology of plant growth, and thus to exploring the effects of environmental, genotypic and mutational variations on plant development and productivity.• We introduce a methodology for analyzing growth patterns of plant roots from twodimensional time series images, treating them as a spatio-temporal three-dimensional (3D) image volume. The roots are segmented from the images and then two types… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of them only measure part of the process, focusing on apical hook angle (Geng et al, 2013;Russino et al, 2013;Slovak et al, 2014), while others only measure length and length variation (French et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2009;Geng et al, 2013), the relative elemental growth rate (REGR; van der Weele et al, 2003;Walter et al, 2002) or curvature (French et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2009). Recent advances have been made in measurement of the full kinematics, mainly in roots (Basu et al, 2007;Chavarria-Krauser et al, 2008;Basu and Pal, 2012), inflorescence stems (Hall and Ellis, 2013) or a variety of organs (Barbier de Reuille et al, 2015). One method relies on a structure tensor and optical flow to track the speed of each pixel (Chavarria-Krauser et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them only measure part of the process, focusing on apical hook angle (Geng et al, 2013;Russino et al, 2013;Slovak et al, 2014), while others only measure length and length variation (French et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2009;Geng et al, 2013), the relative elemental growth rate (REGR; van der Weele et al, 2003;Walter et al, 2002) or curvature (French et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2009). Recent advances have been made in measurement of the full kinematics, mainly in roots (Basu et al, 2007;Chavarria-Krauser et al, 2008;Basu and Pal, 2012), inflorescence stems (Hall and Ellis, 2013) or a variety of organs (Barbier de Reuille et al, 2015). One method relies on a structure tensor and optical flow to track the speed of each pixel (Chavarria-Krauser et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of both general purpose and custom root analysis systems, many unique quantitative studies of root system growth are now possible (Zeng, Birchfield & Wells 2008;Le Bot et al 2010). In recent years, root analysis system designs have focused on combining imaging methods with automated algorithms that enable root system features to be measured or tracked (Armengaud et al 2009;French et al 2009;Basu & Pal 2012;Galkovskyi et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of such sequences may lead to better insight into the development of the root system (e.g. DART, SmartRoot) or even reveal growth zones and their local growth velocities (Basu and Pal, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RootReader2D, GiA Roots, SmartRoot, EZ-Rhizo; Stingaciu et al [2013]). Other methods include the livewire algorithm (Basu and Pal, 2012) or the levelset method (RootTrak; Mairhofer et al, 2012) that determine the borders of each root. The creation of a root system skeleton is either done manually (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%