2013
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pct162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Tomato NAC (NAM/ATAF1/2/CUC2) Transcription Factor, SlNAC4, Functions as a Positive Regulator of Fruit Ripening and Carotenoid Accumulation

Abstract: Fruit ripening in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is a complicated development process affected by both endogenous hormonal and genetic regulators and external signals. Although the role of NOR, a member of the NAC domain family, in mediating tomato fruit ripening has been established, its underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear. To explore further the role of NAC transcription factors in fruit ripening, we characterized a new tomato NAC domain protein, named SlNAC4, which shows high accumulation in sepal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
205
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
205
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is conceivable that, prior to fruit ripening, other flavor-related gene promoters and promoters involved in ethylene biosynthesis and softening are actively repressed. Such complexity has been observed in tomato, where the action of the APETALA2 (AP2) class TF SlAP2a/AP2a (Chung et al, 2010;Karlova et al, 2011) negatively regulates fruit ripening, whereas the action of positive signals such as LeMADS-RIN (Vrebalov et al, 2002), CLEAR NON-RIPENING/Cnr (Manning et al, 2006), TAGL1 (Vrebalov et al, 2009), LeHB-1 , and the NAC TFs SlNAC4 and NOR (Martel et al, 2011;Zhu et al, 2014) promotes ripening.…”
Section: Terpene Synthase Transcriptional Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is conceivable that, prior to fruit ripening, other flavor-related gene promoters and promoters involved in ethylene biosynthesis and softening are actively repressed. Such complexity has been observed in tomato, where the action of the APETALA2 (AP2) class TF SlAP2a/AP2a (Chung et al, 2010;Karlova et al, 2011) negatively regulates fruit ripening, whereas the action of positive signals such as LeMADS-RIN (Vrebalov et al, 2002), CLEAR NON-RIPENING/Cnr (Manning et al, 2006), TAGL1 (Vrebalov et al, 2009), LeHB-1 , and the NAC TFs SlNAC4 and NOR (Martel et al, 2011;Zhu et al, 2014) promotes ripening.…”
Section: Terpene Synthase Transcriptional Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rin mutation has been shown to be encoded by a MADS-box TF (Vrebalov et al, 2002) and Cnr by a SQUAMOSA promoter-binding protein (Manning et al, 2006). An uncharacterized NAC (for no apical meristem [NAM], Arabidopsis transcription activation factor [ATAF], and cup-shaped cotyledon [CUC]-domain transcription factor)-domain TF mutation leads to the nor mutant phenotype (Martel et al, 2011), while SlNAC4 could interact with NOR and RIN proteins to affect fruit ripening and carotenoid accumulation (Zhu et al, 2014). Other tomato TFs shown to influence volatile production in fruit include the tomato homeobox protein (LeHB-1; Lin et al, 2008), which induces LeACO1 and ethylene production, and the MADS-box protein TOMATO AGAMOUS-LIKE1 (TAGL1; Itkin et al, 2009;Vrebalov et al, 2009) through direct activation of LeACS2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pons et al (2014) proposed that another TF (TT19) is related to the accumulation of anthocyanin and proanthocyanin, and is involved in cell wall composition and sensitivity to chilling. The genes ppa020620m, ppa025596m, and ppa008301m encoding for NAC TFs are specific to plants and are involved in MD Romeu et al 2014), ripening (Giovannoni et al 1995;Thompson et al 1999;Giovannoni 2007;Shan et al 2012;Zhu et al 2014), biotic and abiotic stress (Fujita et al 2004;He et al 2005;Nakashima et al 2007;Hu et al 2008;Nakashima et al 2012;Jin et al 2013). Furthermore, these TFs are involved in the ABA-dependent response to dehydration, reactive oxygen species detoxification and defense (Fujita et al 2004).…”
Section: Candidate Genes For M Md and Srmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The susceptibility of fruit with altered expression of the negative ripening regulators: SlMADS1, a tomato homolog of APETALLA SlAP2a and the ethylene response factor SlERF6 (Chung et al 2010 ;Karlova et al 2011Karlova et al , 2013Lee et al 2012 ;Dong et al 2013 ), or the positive regulators, SlNAC4, TOMATO AGAMOUS-LIKE 1 (SlTAGL1), the tomato FRUITFULL homologs (SlFUL1 and SlFUL2) and the HD-Zip homeobox transcription factor SlHB1 (Lin et al 2008 ;Shima et al 2013 ;Zhu et al 2014 ;Fujisawa et al 2014 ) has not been evaluated. Other transcription regulators related to fruit development, but not directly involved in ripening, could also impact the outcome of fruit-B.…”
Section: Transcriptional Regulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%