1971
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1971.tb01086.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Tomato Mutant Inefficient in the Transport of Iron

Abstract: An Fe‐inefficient tomato mutant, T3238fe (Lycopersicon esculentum) was identified by growing the plants in solution cultures containing different concentrations of FeHEDTA. Approach grafts of T3238Fe (Fe‐efficient) top on T3238fe rootstock and vice versa, located the cause of Fe inefficiency in T3238fe roots. The T3238Fe tomato takes up more Fe than T3238fe and it responds favorably to Fe‐stress by releasing hydrogen ions from its roots, increasing reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ at its roots, and increasing the cit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of sequence similarity outside of the bHLH motif, FIT1 is the Arabidopsis protein most closely related to the FER protein of tomato. As described here, the chlorotic and lethal phenotype of fit1 plants correlates with the description previously given for the fer mutant (Brown et al, 1971;Ling et al, 2002). We have shown that FIT1 message accumulates to higher levels under iron-deficient growth conditions than under iron-sufficient growth conditions in roots ( Figure 1A).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of sequence similarity outside of the bHLH motif, FIT1 is the Arabidopsis protein most closely related to the FER protein of tomato. As described here, the chlorotic and lethal phenotype of fit1 plants correlates with the description previously given for the fer mutant (Brown et al, 1971;Ling et al, 2002). We have shown that FIT1 message accumulates to higher levels under iron-deficient growth conditions than under iron-sufficient growth conditions in roots ( Figure 1A).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The FER mutant was initially characterized as being unable to induce Strategy I responses under iron deficiency (Brown et al, 1971;Brown and Ambler, 1974). Grafting experiments have shown that the fer gene is required in roots but not in shoots (Brown et al, 1971). Recent cloning of the fer gene reveals that it encodes a basic helix-loophelix (bHLH) putative transcription factor (Ling et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most promising clues on the regulation of strategy I are expected from the identification of the fer gene. The fer (T3238fer) mutant is not able to switch on strategy I responses after iron deficiency, such as enhanced extrusion of protons and Fe(III)-chelate reductase activity in the root (15,16). Reciprocal grafting of the mutant to a wild type indicated that the fer gene is required in roots but not in shoots (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A promising clue about signaling components involved in iron acquisition was recently derived from the molecular identification of the tomato fer gene encoding a root-specific bHLH protein (25). The tomato fer mutant is unable to develop physiological and morphological iron-deficiency responses such as iron reduction and induced Leirt1 transporter gene expression in roots and accumulates less iron than wild type, leading to severe chlorosis (25)(26)(27). The fer gene seems to be required for sensing iron availability in the root tip and subsequently regulating the appropriate physiological and morphological responses (25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%