2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new threshold selection method for X-ray computed tomography for dimensional metrology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another method uses the histogram of individual cross-sectional slices with a separate determination of the threshold value for each stack, although its use is only recommended in CT images of parts made of a single material [ 8 ]. The surface extraction procedure presented in [ 9 ] is a method that requires the calibration of a reference workpiece to determine a certain correction for air-material threshold values on the gray scale of the CT volume. An alternative method is based on the local or dynamic threshold, in which a threshold value can be defined for each of the elements or zones of the tomographic volume [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method uses the histogram of individual cross-sectional slices with a separate determination of the threshold value for each stack, although its use is only recommended in CT images of parts made of a single material [ 8 ]. The surface extraction procedure presented in [ 9 ] is a method that requires the calibration of a reference workpiece to determine a certain correction for air-material threshold values on the gray scale of the CT volume. An alternative method is based on the local or dynamic threshold, in which a threshold value can be defined for each of the elements or zones of the tomographic volume [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verification of the model consists in comparing the results obtained from the simulated images with those obtained for CT scans (comparing the percentage value of the deviation of the cross-sectional area in terms of the default value -PS deviation). The deviation values of PS from both methods are determined according to [11]. Example image of a 50 mm sphere, obtained by MCM simulation and actual measurement, is shown in Fig.2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offset of the reference workpiece from the axis of rotation will change the value of the cross-section area of the sphere depending on the angular setting. For this reason, each measurement was made from 1500 projections, recorded every 50 X-ray images, and for each image the PS value was determined according to [11]. The obtained values of the deviations were determined as the average value of PS for comparison with the results from the simulation.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bone tissue is isolated from air, soft tissue (bone marrow), and metallic implant by the different specific threshold values. The ISO 50% method based on the grayscale histogram is commonly used to determine the bone threshold [ 18 , 27 ]. However, the low-mineralized bone has a similar threshold value with bone marrow or soft tissue, and their threshold ranges unavoidably overlap with each other.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%