2007
DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/17/9/006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new test facility for efficient evaluation of MEMS contact materials

Abstract: A novel test facility for the efficient evaluation of microelectromechanical system (MEMS) switches and the development of alternative contact materials is described. The facility utilizes the upper cantilever from commercial MEMS contact switches, and tests these against alternative bottom contact materials within a modified atomic force microscope (AFM). The test closely approximates the real switch, but can accommodate a wider range of test conditions and contact materials. The facility allows alternative c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 and 1 GHz, -10 dBm RF input signal. It is expected that switch resistance will decrease to a stable value during the initial cycling [6]. A measured example of this behavior is shown in Fig.…”
Section: System Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…3 and 1 GHz, -10 dBm RF input signal. It is expected that switch resistance will decrease to a stable value during the initial cycling [6]. A measured example of this behavior is shown in Fig.…”
Section: System Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…R C and F C ) to determine their performance [10][11][12][13][14]. These methods, however, have some severe limitations.…”
Section: Micro-contacts Test Fixturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…electric motor was expected to surpass the rate limitations of the AFM [1]. The ability to apply a known contact force enables greater accuracy for determining micro-contact resistance and is the reason that AFMs are employed for testing [2]. By using a piezo electric actuator with a high-sample rate capable force sensor instead of an AFM, there was no expected decrease in micro-contact force accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%