2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2014.12.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new technique of characterization of intrapixel response dedicated to astronomical detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optical system of this method is very complex; therefore, the continuously self-imaging grating (CSIG) method has been applied. The CSIG method consists of the sampling of the pixel transfer function by projecting high-resolution periodic patterns without classic optics but using the CSIG illuminated by a plane wave, and the IPS is determined by inverse Fourier transform [9,10]. Although the CSIG method does not require a complex optical system, it can only characterize the average IPS of all pixels in the photodetector array, and the accuracy of IPS characterization for the CSIG method is not high because it cannot consider the physical principle of IPS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical system of this method is very complex; therefore, the continuously self-imaging grating (CSIG) method has been applied. The CSIG method consists of the sampling of the pixel transfer function by projecting high-resolution periodic patterns without classic optics but using the CSIG illuminated by a plane wave, and the IPS is determined by inverse Fourier transform [9,10]. Although the CSIG method does not require a complex optical system, it can only characterize the average IPS of all pixels in the photodetector array, and the accuracy of IPS characterization for the CSIG method is not high because it cannot consider the physical principle of IPS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However this technique allows one to obtain a MTF (then PSF or LSF) of an average pixel corresponding to an area of the detector. Ketchazo et al [6] presented an adaptation of this technique for the characterization of the intrapixel response of each pixel of a detector. The idea is to couple the projection of the interferograms made of sub-pixel details with a precise micro-scanning process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%