2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new taxonomy for examining the multi-role of campus sustainability assessments in organizational change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These tools are also too operational not evaluating the strategic processes, as also stressed by Arroyo [33]. being able to incorporate the unpredictable and not only knowing how to deal with linear problems but also being able to assess what external impact HEIs have in practice on sustainability and going beyond the limits of HEIs [14].…”
Section: Overall Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These tools are also too operational not evaluating the strategic processes, as also stressed by Arroyo [33]. being able to incorporate the unpredictable and not only knowing how to deal with linear problems but also being able to assess what external impact HEIs have in practice on sustainability and going beyond the limits of HEIs [14].…”
Section: Overall Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much work has been done on the development of tools to assess sustainability specifically in HEIs, showing the importance of the theme. Several articles have reviewed these tools from different perspectives (e.g., [7,9,14,16,17,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]). However, it is observed that in these various reviews, the systematization is not homogeneous, noting a lack of common designations and objectives and including tools that do not have as main objective the assessment of the implementation of ESD or are not per se an assessment tool.…”
Section: Sustainability Assessment In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the DESD 2005-2014, the results show that Portuguese public universities implemented sustainability through diverse and multiple actions, mostly by (i) establishing partnerships with other society stakeholders; (ii) implementing policies that promote SD for all students and staff; (iii) signing DCIs within SD, ESD, or sustainability during the UN decade; and also (iv) by promoting best practices. Aleixo et al (2018) and Arroyo et al (2017) [65,66] refer not only to the importance of putting into practice universities' transformative role in SD by including sustainability in an institution's agenda, strategies, and best practices to promote said agenda, but also by the institution remaining engaged in the field despite facing the usual implementation problems, varying from restricted resources to lack of trained staff [3], deficient organizational structure, inertia, and resistance [66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way environmental responsibility becomes personal, leading to environmental awareness, which is the most important motivator since people are the driving force for implementing an EMS (Price, 2005). Therefore, stakeholders play an important role toward campus sustainability (Arroyo, 2017). Jabbour et al (2013) showed that individual motivation and individual environmental management actions are the main drivers for institutional change.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%