2014
DOI: 10.2505/4/tst14_081_01_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Take on the Field Trip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the major benefits of VFTs is that they allow learners to visit places virtually (Lukes, ); hence, the feeling of really being in a place is essential to the experience. This study found that the level of this feeling was higher in all the three subcomponents of presence in immersive VFTs compared to traditional VFTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the major benefits of VFTs is that they allow learners to visit places virtually (Lukes, ); hence, the feeling of really being in a place is essential to the experience. This study found that the level of this feeling was higher in all the three subcomponents of presence in immersive VFTs compared to traditional VFTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VFTs have been used for many years in K‐12 education, higher education, and career preparation and training, across disciplines (Palmer, 2013; Wang, Ni, Rui, Cui, & Cheng, 2016). While the technological complexities of VFTs differ depending on their purpose, VFTs have common benefits; overcoming budgetary limitations (Lukes, 2014) and alleviating logistical barriers in traditional field trips (Krakowka, 2012). While many conventional VFTs use a combination of texts, audio, digital pictures, or digital videos (Hosticka et al , 2002), recent technological innovations permit researchers and practitioners to develop more engaging VFTs using advanced tools (Mathews, Andrews, & Luck, 2012; Treves, Viterbo, & Haklay, 2015; Tutwiler, Lin, & Chang, 2013).…”
Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite positive attitudes toward traditional field trips (Nadelson & Jordan, 2012) and cognitive outcomes attained through trips (Coughlin, 2010), there are several barriers to successful field trips, such as logistical planning and safety issues, lack of funding and resources and lack of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant sites (Tuthill & Klemm, 2002). With the use of VFTs, concerns related to the budget, time and place for trips can be alleviated (Lukes, 2014) with comparable learning benefits (Friess, Oliver, Quak, & Lau, 2016; Palmer, 2013). Moreover, VFTs can be used as an acceptable alternative to traditional trips for students with disabilities (Stumpf, Douglass, & Dorn, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current Information Age, need for distance education and engagement of a mobile smartphone society, and dwindling travel budgets have decreased opportunities for scientists to engage directly in-person with public audiences (Lacina, 2004;Lukes, 2014). As an alternative, some scientists have taken to participating in professionally produced online videos and even developing their own multimedia for reaching public audiences (León and Bourk, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%