2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2012.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new sustainable human development indicator for small island developing states: A reappraisal from data envelopment analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
28
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The HDI was initially developed to underline that people and their capabilities should be the ultimate criteria for evaluating the development level of a country along with economic growth (UNDP, 2013a). Despite a number of authors discuss some drawbacks of the HDI (Trabold-Nübler, 1991;Hicks, 1997;Ivanova, Arcelus, & Srinivasan, 1999;Chowdhury & Squire, 2006;Klugman, Rodríguez, & Choi, 2011), and even propose some modified indices (Paul, 1996;Sharma, 1997;Noorbakhsh, 1998;Chakravarty, 2003;Mazumdar, 2003;Grimm, et al, 2008;Harttgen & Klasen, 2012;Herrero, Martínez, & Villar, 2012;Bilbao-Ubillos, 2013;Blancard & Hoarau, 2013); one of the most significant superiorities of the HDI is regarded as its usefulness that is able to represent both social and economic development through a single value between 0 and 1 (UNDP, 2013b).…”
Section: Human Development and The Hdimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HDI was initially developed to underline that people and their capabilities should be the ultimate criteria for evaluating the development level of a country along with economic growth (UNDP, 2013a). Despite a number of authors discuss some drawbacks of the HDI (Trabold-Nübler, 1991;Hicks, 1997;Ivanova, Arcelus, & Srinivasan, 1999;Chowdhury & Squire, 2006;Klugman, Rodríguez, & Choi, 2011), and even propose some modified indices (Paul, 1996;Sharma, 1997;Noorbakhsh, 1998;Chakravarty, 2003;Mazumdar, 2003;Grimm, et al, 2008;Harttgen & Klasen, 2012;Herrero, Martínez, & Villar, 2012;Bilbao-Ubillos, 2013;Blancard & Hoarau, 2013); one of the most significant superiorities of the HDI is regarded as its usefulness that is able to represent both social and economic development through a single value between 0 and 1 (UNDP, 2013b).…”
Section: Human Development and The Hdimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as the assessment method of DEA not only can bypass calculations of indicator weights and data standardization, but because it is also qualified for evaluating green development efficiency, a growing number of scholars from all over the world choose the DEA method to give appraisals of eco-efficiency and sustainability of regional development [21][22][23].…”
Section: "Urban Green Growth Means Fostering Economic Growth and Devementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is out of the scope of this paper to give a thorough review (but see [14][15][16]). Instead, we recognized and summarized recent efforts to modify and apply the HDI in development assessments into three categories: (1) studies that apply the HDI to examine and compare its tempo-spatial variations in different countries (e.g., [17,18]); (2) studies that modify the HDI by adding one or more indicators on the environmental dimension, and compare the results between the original and modified HDI indices (e.g., [19,20]); and (3) studies that analyze the relationship between the HDI and other variables. Examples include incidence and mortality of certain disease [21][22][23][24][25][26], drug use [27], patient profiles [28], food consumption, obesity [29], suicide and homicide [30], prevalence of physical inactivity [31], infrastructure [32,33], total fertility rate [34], and worldwide governance indicators [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%