1996
DOI: 10.1002/mds.870110607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new sublingual formulation of apomorphine in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease

Abstract: A new formulation of a sublingual tablet with 10 mg apomorphine was examined in 13 patients with Parkinson's disease. Vitamin C (250 mg) was added sublingually to lower the salivary pH. Four patients received sublingual apomorphine and nine received sublingual apomorphine as well as vitamin C. Subcutaneous apomorphine was given to all patients. The study was designed as a randomized three-way cross-over study. Tmax, Cmax, and bioavailability (F) were determined. Clinical efficacy was assessed by hand-tapping d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This delay was however longer than that induced in the same patients by sc apomorphine (median time to ON 16 minutes on apomorphine versus 30 minutes on S90049). This is in line with previous reports showing that time to ON was also longer when apomorphine was administered sublingually (25–40 minutes) 21–23. However, 50% of the S90049 “responders” switched ON within 30 minutes, a delay that is of clinical interest and might improve if greater doses are to be tested in the future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This delay was however longer than that induced in the same patients by sc apomorphine (median time to ON 16 minutes on apomorphine versus 30 minutes on S90049). This is in line with previous reports showing that time to ON was also longer when apomorphine was administered sublingually (25–40 minutes) 21–23. However, 50% of the S90049 “responders” switched ON within 30 minutes, a delay that is of clinical interest and might improve if greater doses are to be tested in the future.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…5 While an extensive literature exists for apomorphine therapy for PD, only a few studies have been conducted as randomized, placebo-controlled trials using subcutaneous injections of apomorphine to abort offstate events. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] To our knowledge, only a single study has been previously published evaluating the drug in both inpatient and outpatient settings; in the outpatient setting, all patients received active drug without a placebo comparator. 7 To date there have been no pub-lished studies attempting to correlate inpatient efficacy measures with outpatient results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Apomorphine administration was: subcutaneous in 29 (50.0%), 5, sublingual in 14 (24.1%), [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] intranasal in 6 (10.3%), [57][58][59][60][61][62] inhaled in 5 (8.6%), [63][64][65][66][67] rectal in 3 (5.2%), [68][69][70] and transdermal in 1 (1.7%). 71 54 studies were interventional, most non-randomized open label (33,61.1%), and without control group (25, 46.3%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%