1992
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(92)85924-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new strategy for the representation of environment effects in semi-empirical calculations based on Dewar's Hamiltonians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

1995
1995
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models assume that the solute is embedded inside a cavity surrounded by an infinite medium (the solvent), which is characterized by suitable physical properties like the permittivity or the thermal expansion coefficient. The root mean square deviation with respect to experimental data was around 1 kcal/mol, 27,28 which supports the suitability of the method to describe solvation in large molecular systems. In the MST/AM1 method the free energy of solvation is given by the addition of electrostatic and steric contributions [Eq.…”
Section: Aqueous-phase Calculationssupporting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These models assume that the solute is embedded inside a cavity surrounded by an infinite medium (the solvent), which is characterized by suitable physical properties like the permittivity or the thermal expansion coefficient. The root mean square deviation with respect to experimental data was around 1 kcal/mol, 27,28 which supports the suitability of the method to describe solvation in large molecular systems. In the MST/AM1 method the free energy of solvation is given by the addition of electrostatic and steric contributions [Eq.…”
Section: Aqueous-phase Calculationssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…In this approach, the solvent reaction field was determined from the solute molecular electrostatic potential computed at the AM1 level using the ortho method. 27,28 The self-consistent nature of the method stems from the mutual dependence between the solute charge distribution and the reaction field. The solute/ solvent interface was determined using a molecular shape algorithm.…”
Section: Aqueous-phase Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The free energies of solvation were determined using a semiempirical adapted version (Negre et al, 1992;Luque et al, 1994) of the SCRF developed by Miertus, Scrocco, and Tomasi (MST) (Miertus et al, 1981;Miertus and Tomasi, 1982). According to this method, the free energy of solvation was determined by addition of electrostatic and steric contributions [Eqn (3)], where the latter was computed as the sum of cavitation and van der Waals terms.…”
Section: Gas Phase Conformations Conformational Preferences Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%