1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9270(99)00290-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new strategy for the application of CA19-9 in the differentiation of pancreaticobiliary cancer: analysis using a receiver operating characteristic curve

Abstract: The use of CA19-9 for the differentiation of pancreaticobiliary cancer should be applied individually, depending on the clinical situation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
34
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used ROC curve for the statistical analysis of bilirubin and CA 19-9 levels ROC curve has been extensively used by Hong-Ja Kim et al in their statistical analysis of CA 19-9 in various pancreatico-biliary diseases [12]. In our study, cut off for bilirubin and CA 19-9 levels obtained by ROC were 3mg/dl and 35U/ml respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We used ROC curve for the statistical analysis of bilirubin and CA 19-9 levels ROC curve has been extensively used by Hong-Ja Kim et al in their statistical analysis of CA 19-9 in various pancreatico-biliary diseases [12]. In our study, cut off for bilirubin and CA 19-9 levels obtained by ROC were 3mg/dl and 35U/ml respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, CA 19-9 above 150 U/mL was poor prognostic factor in only univariate analysis (Table 4). Although some tumor markers have been investigated to diagnose cholangiocarcinoma31-35 and predict post-operative prognosis or recurrence,36-38 to our knowledge this is the first study to investigate the prognostic capability of tumor markers in cholangiocarcinoma patients without any surgery, chemotherapy or radiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we could not evaluate the immediate causes of death exactly. In addition, cut-off values of tumor markers were determined arbitrarily because it was not possible to calculate the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve due to the death of all patients and the range of tumor markers from the previous studies35-38 was too wide to determine appropriate reference values. Despite these limitations, this is the largest study to date regarding this topic and all data were obtained from a single institute making data interpretation more reliable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results including our study suggest that CA19-9 is sufficient marker for predicting prognosis as well as marker for tracking cancer recurrence. However, the value of CA19-9 is known to be influenced by cholestasis[15], and it is known that the higher the pre-treatment value, the worse the prognosis[14,16]. Therefore, we conducted a univariate and multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model with a category of more than 3 mg/dL of total bilirubin (bilirubin ≄ 3) and more than 300 U/mL of CA19-9 (CA19-9 ≄ 300) based on the results of Kim et al[15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%