2014
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new statistical framework to assess structural alignment quality using information compression

Abstract: Motivation: Progress in protein biology depends on the reliability of results from a handful of computational techniques, structural alignments being one. Recent reviews have highlighted substantial inconsistencies and differences between alignment results generated by the ever-growing stock of structural alignment programs. The lack of consensus on how the quality of structural alignments must be assessed has been identified as the main cause for the observed differences. Current methods assess structural ali… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude that, as discussed previously for globular proteins, there is room for improvement in structure alignment programs, both in terms of alignment accuracy and alignment consistency . Introducing membrane location information within the superimposition procedure of membrane proteins might be one approach to improving the alignment quality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We conclude that, as discussed previously for globular proteins, there is room for improvement in structure alignment programs, both in terms of alignment accuracy and alignment consistency . Introducing membrane location information within the superimposition procedure of membrane proteins might be one approach to improving the alignment quality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The major challenge in assessing structural alignment accuracy is the lack of a standard score that ranks the quality of structural alignments. Although efforts have been made to address this issue recently, those strategies are not yet publicly available. Here, we rely on the expectation that a homology model built using the ideal alignment should provide sufficient information to reconstruct the structure of the other protein.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The term I null ( c j ) represents the number of bits needed to transmit a single c j using the 23-component Kent mixture model whose computation is described below.…”
Section: S2 Computation Of Null Model Message Length: I Null (S) and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, each r j is the distance between C α atom c j−1 and c j , and can be encoded efficiently using a normal distribution N with the parameters µ = 3.8Å and standard deviation of σ = 0.2Å. 4 This code length is computed as I radius (r j ) = − log 2 ( · N (r j ; µ, σ)).…”
Section: S2 Computation Of Null Model Message Length: I Null (S) and mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation