2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

24
3,135
4
25

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,811 publications
(3,256 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
24
3,135
4
25
Order By: Relevance
“…From the Talaraiched structural images, the TT_N27 atlas in AFNI, based on the Eickhoff–Zilles cytoarchitectonic probabilistic atlas developed in the SPM Anatomy Toolbox (Eickhoff et al., 2005), was used to anatomically identify our a priori primary regions of interest (ROI): the left and right amygdala for each participant. To assess group‐level differences in functional connectivity, a bilateral amygdala ROI was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the Talaraiched structural images, the TT_N27 atlas in AFNI, based on the Eickhoff–Zilles cytoarchitectonic probabilistic atlas developed in the SPM Anatomy Toolbox (Eickhoff et al., 2005), was used to anatomically identify our a priori primary regions of interest (ROI): the left and right amygdala for each participant. To assess group‐level differences in functional connectivity, a bilateral amygdala ROI was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anatomical designation of the regional effects were based upon maxima or peaks in the ensuing statistical parametric maps: cluster peaks were first extracted using the Peak_nii software (www.nitrc.org/projects/peak_nii) and then labelled using the cytoarchitectonic probability maps provided by the SPM Anatomy toolbox [Eickhoff et al, 2005, 2007b]. The SPM anatomy toolbox included individual areas such as: primary motor cortex [Brodmann areas (BA) 4a and 4p] [Geyer et al, 1996], premotor cortex (BA 6) [Geyer, 2003], primary somatosensory cortex (BA 3a, 3b, 1) [Geyer et al, 1996], somatosensory cortex (BA 2) [Grefkes et al, 2001], parietal operculum or S2 (OP 1‐4) [Eickhoff et al, 2006a, 2006b,2007a], intraparietal sulcus [Choi et al, 2006; Scheperjans et al, 2008a, 2008b], superior parietal cortex [Scheperjans et al, 2008a,,b], inferior parietal cortex [Caspers et al, 2008], and visual areas (V4) [Rottschy et al, 2007] (V4) [Malikovic et al, 2007].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This initial averaging reduces the possibility of detecting any effect that is highly localized in the brain. Alternative applications of the method may consider different templates, for example using cytoarchitectonic‐based atlases [Eickhoff et al, 2005] or defining ad hoc templates based on independent functional data. The latter could include the investigation of network re‐configurations within the occipital visual cortex, by first constructing a specific template based on individual retinotopic maps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%