A New Species of Trisetacus (Acarina: Eriophyoidea: Nalepellidae) from Scotch Pine1

Styer, W. E.; Nielsen, D. G.; Balderston, C. P.

doi:10.1093/aesa/65.5.1089

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some Trisetacus species attack berries and destroy their seeds (Shevchenko 1962 ) or cause serious damage in nurseries and young stands of cypress (Simoni et al 2004 ). The most serious damage is observed when mites occur in large colonies, and mass outbreaks of Trisetacus species in forests have been reported (Kruel 1963 ; Keifer and Saunders 1972 ; Styer et al 1972 ; Shevchenko 1995 ; Marshall and Clayton 2004 ). In view of the economic importance of Trisetacus mites, damage control and management is imperative, which requires an improvement in the taxonomy of this group (Hoy 2011 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Genetic and morphological diversity of Trisetacus species (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae) associated with coniferous trees in Poland: phylogeny, barcoding, host and habitat specialization

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eriophyoid species belonging to the genus Trisetacus are economically important as pests of conifers. A narrow host specialization to conifers and some unique morphological characteristics have made these mites interesting subjects for scientific inquiry. In this study, we assessed morphological and genetic variation of seven Trisetacus species originating from six coniferous hosts in Poland by morphometric analysis and molecular sequencing of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene and the nuclear D2 region of 28S rDNA. The results confirmed the monophyly of the genus Trisetacus as well as the monophyly of five of the seven species studied. Both DNA sequences were effective in discriminating between six of the seven species tested. Host-dependent genetic and morphological variation in T. silvestris and T. relocatus, and habitat-dependent genetic and morphological variation in T. juniperinus were detected, suggesting the existence of races or even distinct species within these Trisetacus taxa. This is the first molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Trisetacus species. The findings presented here will stimulate further investigations on the evolutionary relationships of Trisetacus as well as the entire Phytoptidae family.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Genetic and morphological diversity of Trisetacus species (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae) associated with coniferous trees in Poland: phylogeny, barcoding, host and habitat specialization

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…columbiensis resembles that found in members of T . gemmavitians Styer et al (1972) from buds of Pinus spp. However, members of T .…”

Section: February 1984mentioning

confidence: 99%

DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES OF TRISETACUS (PROSTIGMATA: ERIOPHYOIDEA) FROM PINACEAE IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA

Smith¹

1984

Can Entomol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They proposed Nalepellidae as a new family name to replace Phytoptidae. Since then, Nalepellidae has begun to be used by North American workers, e.g., Styer et al (1972). Before T h i s action has resulted in the current concept of Phytoptus being identical with the previous concept of Eriophyes von Siebold.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Nomenclatural Status and Authorship of Some Family-Group Names in the Eriophyoidea (Acarina: Prostigmata)

Lindquist¹

1974

Can Entomol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The following suggestions in use of family-group names for eriophyoid mites are made in accordance with the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. (1) The name Sierraphytoptidae Keifer 1944 should have priority over Nalepellidae Roivainen 1953 sensu Newkirk and Keifer (1971). (2) The name Diptilomiopidae Keifer 1944 should have priority over Rhyncaphytoptidae Roivainen 1953 sensu Keifer (1961). (3) The superfamily concept of Shevchenko (1968, 1971) should take the name Nalepelloidea Roivainen 1953 rather than Trisetacoidea (a justified emendation of "Trisetoidea") Shevchenko 1968. (4) The names Nalepellidae and Nalepellini should take Roivainen 1953 as author rather than Newkirk and Keifer (1971). (5) Similarly, the names Sierraphytoptini Keifer 1944, Mackiellini Keifer 1946, Diptilomiopinae Keifer 1944, and Trisetacini Shevchenko 1968 should retain their authors and dates as first proposed for new family-group taxa, rather than being new taxa as proposed by Newkirk and Keifer (1971).

show abstract

A New Species of Trisetacus (Acarina: Eriophyoidea: Nalepellidae) from Scotch Pine1

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Genetic and morphological diversity of Trisetacus species (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae) associated with coniferous trees in Poland: phylogeny, barcoding, host and habitat specialization

Genetic and morphological diversity of Trisetacus species (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae) associated with coniferous trees in Poland: phylogeny, barcoding, host and habitat specialization

DESCRIPTIONS OF NEW SPECIES OF TRISETACUS (PROSTIGMATA: ERIOPHYOIDEA) FROM PINACEAE IN WESTERN NORTH AMERICA

Nomenclatural Status and Authorship of Some Family-Group Names in the Eriophyoidea (Acarina: Prostigmata)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About