“…Musa ("Eumusa") 2n = 2x = 22 and sect. Rhodochlamys 2n = 2x = 22 (Cheesman & Larter, 1935;Cheesman & Dodds, 1942;Cheesman, 1947;MacDaniels, 1947;Shepherd, 1959Shepherd, , 1990Shepherd, , 1999Simmonds, 1962;Champion, 1967;Hotta, 1967;Simmonds & Weatherup, 1990;Isobe & Hashimoto, 1994;Sharrock, 2000;Häkkinen, 2001Häkkinen, , 2003aHäkkinen, , b, 2004aHäkkinen, , b, 2005aHäkkinen, , b, 2006aHäkkinen, , b, c, 2007Häkkinen, , 2009aHäkkinen, , b, c, 2011Jong & Argent, 2001;Wu & Kress, 2001;Häkkinen & Sharrock, 2002;Häkkinen & Meekiong, 2004Häkkinen & al., , 2007aHäkkinen & al., , b, 2008Häkkinen & al., , 2009Häkkinen & al., , 2012Häkkinen & Wallace, 2007;Häkkinen & Teo, 2008;Häkkinen & Väre, 2008a, b, c, 2009a, b, 2011Liu & al., 2010;Nayar, 2010). Liu & al., 2010;Nayar, 2010;Christelova & al., 2011;Xavier & al., 2011) demonstrated that none of the five sections of Musa previously defined based on morphology was recovered as monophyletic.…”