2016
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4193.2.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new species of Scinax Wagler (Anura: Hylidae) from Paraná, Southern Brazil

Abstract: In this article, we describe a new species of Scinax from the state of Paraná, southern Brazil, based on the external morphology of adults and their advertisement calls. The new species is diagnosed by the size of its males (SVL 27.8-31.6 mm); the snout subovoid in the dorsal view and slightly acuminate in profile; the vocal sac subgular and ventrally not reaching the pectoral region; and the advertisement call composed of a single pulsed note with 7-13 pulses, and a duration of 0.16-0.25s. This new species oc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 898 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The small body size of the males (SVL 22.6–25.9 mm) distinguishes S. ruberoculatus sp. nov from the following species: S. acuminatus (Cope, 1862) (SVL 39.0–45.0 mm; Lutz, 1973 ); S. baumgardneri (Rivero, 1961) (SVL 29.0–32.0 mm; Rivero, 1961 ); S. blairi (Fouquette & Pyburn, 1972) (SVL 27.8–30.1 mm; Fouquette & Pyburn, 1972 ); S. boesemani (Goin, 1966) (SVL 28.4–31.8 mm; Duellman, 1986 ); S. camposseabrai (Bokermann, 1968) (SVL 28.9–33.5 mm; Caramaschi & Cardoso, 2006 ); S. castroviejoi De la Riva, 1993 (SVL 45.0 mm; De la Riva, 1993 ); S. chiquitanus (De la Riva, 1990) (SVL 27.9–33.3 mm; Duellman & Wiens, 1993 ); S. dolloi (Werner, 1903) (male syntype SVL 34.9 mm; according Araujo-Vieira, Brandão & Faria, 2015 ); S. elaeochrous (Cope, 1875) (SVL 26–32 mm; Savage, 2002 ); S. eurydice (Bokermann, 1968) (SVL 44.0–52.0 mm; Bokermann, 1968 ); S. funereus (Cope, 1874) (SVL 29.8–36.9 mm; Duellman, 1971 ; Duellman & Wiens, 1993 ); S. fuscovarius (Lutz, 1925) (SVL 41–44 mm; Cei, 1980 ); S. granulatus (Peters, 1871) (SVL 32.0–38.0 mm; Cei, 1980 ); S. haddadorum Araujo-Vieira, Valdujo & Faivovich, 2016 (SVL 29.4–35.4 mm; Araujo-Vieira, Valdujo & Faivovich, 2016 ); S. hayii (Barbour, 1909) (SVL 39.0–42.0 mm; Lutz, 1973 ); S. ictericus Duellman & Wiens, 1993 (SVL 26.3–31.8 mm; Duellman, 2005 ); S. iquitorum (Moravec et al, 2009) (SVL 35.0–38.5 mm; Moravec et al, 2009 ); S. manriquei Barrio-Amorós, Orellana & Chacón-Ortiz, 2004 (SVL 27.7 mm; Barrio-Amorós, Orellana & Chacón-Ortiz, 2004 ); S. maracaya (Cardoso & Sazima, 1980) (SVL 26.7–28.0 mm; Cardoso & Sazima, 1980 ); S. nasicus (Cope, 1862) (SVL 27–35 mm; Cei, 1980 ); S. oreites Duellman & Wiens, 1993 (SVL 28.4–33.5 mm; Duellman & Wiens, 1993 ); S. perereca Pombal Jr, Haddad & Kasahara, 1995 (SVL 34.0–38.5 mm; Pombal Jr, Haddad & Kasahara, 1995 ); S. quinquefasciatus (Fowler, 1913) (SVL 29.6–34.0 m; Duellman, 1971 ); S. rossaferesae Conte et al, 2016 (SVL 27.8–31.6 mm; Conte et al, 2016 ); S. ruber (Laurenti, 1768) (SVL 29.4–41.2 mm; Duellman & Wiens, 1993 ), S. sateremawe Sturaro & Peloso, 2014 (SVL 35.2–38.1 mm; Sturaro & Peloso, 2014 ); S. similis (Cochran 1952) (SVL 30.4–36.8 mm...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small body size of the males (SVL 22.6–25.9 mm) distinguishes S. ruberoculatus sp. nov from the following species: S. acuminatus (Cope, 1862) (SVL 39.0–45.0 mm; Lutz, 1973 ); S. baumgardneri (Rivero, 1961) (SVL 29.0–32.0 mm; Rivero, 1961 ); S. blairi (Fouquette & Pyburn, 1972) (SVL 27.8–30.1 mm; Fouquette & Pyburn, 1972 ); S. boesemani (Goin, 1966) (SVL 28.4–31.8 mm; Duellman, 1986 ); S. camposseabrai (Bokermann, 1968) (SVL 28.9–33.5 mm; Caramaschi & Cardoso, 2006 ); S. castroviejoi De la Riva, 1993 (SVL 45.0 mm; De la Riva, 1993 ); S. chiquitanus (De la Riva, 1990) (SVL 27.9–33.3 mm; Duellman & Wiens, 1993 ); S. dolloi (Werner, 1903) (male syntype SVL 34.9 mm; according Araujo-Vieira, Brandão & Faria, 2015 ); S. elaeochrous (Cope, 1875) (SVL 26–32 mm; Savage, 2002 ); S. eurydice (Bokermann, 1968) (SVL 44.0–52.0 mm; Bokermann, 1968 ); S. funereus (Cope, 1874) (SVL 29.8–36.9 mm; Duellman, 1971 ; Duellman & Wiens, 1993 ); S. fuscovarius (Lutz, 1925) (SVL 41–44 mm; Cei, 1980 ); S. granulatus (Peters, 1871) (SVL 32.0–38.0 mm; Cei, 1980 ); S. haddadorum Araujo-Vieira, Valdujo & Faivovich, 2016 (SVL 29.4–35.4 mm; Araujo-Vieira, Valdujo & Faivovich, 2016 ); S. hayii (Barbour, 1909) (SVL 39.0–42.0 mm; Lutz, 1973 ); S. ictericus Duellman & Wiens, 1993 (SVL 26.3–31.8 mm; Duellman, 2005 ); S. iquitorum (Moravec et al, 2009) (SVL 35.0–38.5 mm; Moravec et al, 2009 ); S. manriquei Barrio-Amorós, Orellana & Chacón-Ortiz, 2004 (SVL 27.7 mm; Barrio-Amorós, Orellana & Chacón-Ortiz, 2004 ); S. maracaya (Cardoso & Sazima, 1980) (SVL 26.7–28.0 mm; Cardoso & Sazima, 1980 ); S. nasicus (Cope, 1862) (SVL 27–35 mm; Cei, 1980 ); S. oreites Duellman & Wiens, 1993 (SVL 28.4–33.5 mm; Duellman & Wiens, 1993 ); S. perereca Pombal Jr, Haddad & Kasahara, 1995 (SVL 34.0–38.5 mm; Pombal Jr, Haddad & Kasahara, 1995 ); S. quinquefasciatus (Fowler, 1913) (SVL 29.6–34.0 m; Duellman, 1971 ); S. rossaferesae Conte et al, 2016 (SVL 27.8–31.6 mm; Conte et al, 2016 ); S. ruber (Laurenti, 1768) (SVL 29.4–41.2 mm; Duellman & Wiens, 1993 ), S. sateremawe Sturaro & Peloso, 2014 (SVL 35.2–38.1 mm; Sturaro & Peloso, 2014 ); S. similis (Cochran 1952) (SVL 30.4–36.8 mm...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic record for S. exiguus from Cantá extends the distribution approximately 65 km southward from the previous southernmost locality at Boa Vista [2] ( Figure 4). Recently, this species was indirectly reported for three localities in the Brazilian state of Roraima (Boa Vista, and two new records: Pacaraima and Tepequém) in a list of examined specimens in the description of S. rossaferesae [10]. Subsequently, one of the authors of the description of S. rossaferesae formalized those records in Araujo-Vieira [f11] as being the first records of S. exiguus in Brazil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las líneas de evidencia que apoyan la delimitación de esta nueva especie, incluyen algunos rasgos morfológicos (en adultos y larvas) y bioacústicos, que a nivel supraespecífico han sido empleadas en aproximaciones previas y recientes del género (Araujo-Vieira et al, 2015Brusquettti et al, 2014;Conte et al, 2016;Faivovich et al, 2005;Juncá et al, 2015;Lourenço et al, 2013Lourenço et al, , 2016Sturaro y Peloso, 2014). Por otra parte, Suárez y Lynch (2011) indican que uno de los rasgos larvales para la distinción de Scinax x-signatus frente a S. ruber es la relación del sitio de inserción (inicio) de la aleta dorsal con el cuerpo, la cual se inicia a la altura del borde posterior de los ojos en Scinax x-signatus, mientras que en S. ruber se inicia en la mitad del cuerpo; este último rasgo es compartido con S. caprarius sp.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified