2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01520.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new species of mullet (Teleostei: Mugilidae) from Venezuela, with a discussion on the taxonomy of Mugil gaimardianus

Abstract: The original description of Mugil gaimardianus has created various taxonomic problems in the past since the description is ambiguous and the type specimen is apparently lost. The name M. gaimardianus could not be reliably applied to any known species and was suppressed by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN) (Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 51: 286–287, 1994). Nevertheless, karyological evidence has shown that there is a species of mullet in Venezuelan coastal waters that does no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
41
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…recorded by measuring each preserved specimen with a pair of dividers following Harrison et al (2007). These current data were compared to previous morphometrics recorded for small mugilids (Anderson 1957) by physically drawing lines parallel to the axes on the published regression graphs to obtain the previous values.…”
Section: U N C O R R E C T E D P R O O F S -N O T F O R D I S T R I Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…recorded by measuring each preserved specimen with a pair of dividers following Harrison et al (2007). These current data were compared to previous morphometrics recorded for small mugilids (Anderson 1957) by physically drawing lines parallel to the axes on the published regression graphs to obtain the previous values.…”
Section: U N C O R R E C T E D P R O O F S -N O T F O R D I S T R I Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Harrison et al, 2007;Rossi et al, 1998a;Trewavas and Ingham, 1972). It is difficult to distinguish between the genera Mugil and Liza (Rossi et al, 1998a) by appearance and morphology, and the economic value of M. cehpalus is quite a bit higher than that of Liza affinis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agonostomus monticola (Bancroft 1834)-Mountain Mullet (Gut Mullet), Fig Remarks: The precise Caribbean distribution of this recently described mullet (Harrison et al, 2007) is uncertain owing to its similarity to M. curema. These two species can be distinguished (characters of M. rubrioculus given first with those of M. curema in parentheses) as follows: in life, iris reddish-orange (absent or indistinct), base of pectoral fin with small dark spot on dorsal part of base (dark spot extending vertically down most of fin base), anal fin pale (fin dark); scales on flanks usually lack minute, overlying secondary scales (flanks usually with secondary scales).…”
Section: Mugilidae-mullets (7 Species)mentioning
confidence: 99%