2010
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.2346.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new species of ladyfish, of the genus Elops (Elopiformes: Elopidae), from the western Atlantic Ocean

Abstract: v This paper describes Elops smithi, n. sp., and designates a lectotype for E. saurus. These two species can be separated from the five other species of Elops by a combination of vertebrae and gillraker counts. Morphologically, they can be distinguished from each other only by myomere (larvae) or vertebrae (adults) counts. Elops smithi has 73–80 centra (total number of vertebrae), usually with 75–78 centra; E. saurus has 79–87 centra, usually with 81–85 centra. No other morphological character is known to sepa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This specimen was filleted for vertebrae counts and unfortunately it could not be kept. Additional morphometric and meristic measurements were performed on the two specimens preserved in ichthyological collections following McBride et al (2010) (Table 1). The maximum Tl recorded for E .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This specimen was filleted for vertebrae counts and unfortunately it could not be kept. Additional morphometric and meristic measurements were performed on the two specimens preserved in ichthyological collections following McBride et al (2010) (Table 1). The maximum Tl recorded for E .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…smithi (De Sousa et al, 2019; Machado et al, 2012). Consequently, we consider that at least part of the existing information of these species may be confounded and we urge future studies on Elops genus to consider diagnostic characteristic indicated by McBride et al (2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations