2022
DOI: 10.2744/ccb-1524.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New South American Freshwater Turtle of the Genus Mesoclemmys from the Brazilian Amazon (Testudines: Pleurodira: Chelidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phylogenetic analysis. Cunha et al (2021Cunha et al ( , 2022 justified the formal description of M. jurutiensis and M. sabiniparaensis with the putative phylogenetic distinctness in two mitochondrial gene fragments, namely 16S (16S ribosomal RNA gene) and the barcoding gene COI (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I). The downsides of using only mtDNA to delineate species are widely known: mtDNA is uniparentally inherited, considered a single genetic locus, has the propensity to introgress across species borders and to transfer into the nuclear genome, has little use in detecting hybridization, and often yields topologies that do not represent species trees (Moore 1995;Toews & Brelsford 2012;Allendorf 2017;Hillis 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Phylogenetic analysis. Cunha et al (2021Cunha et al ( , 2022 justified the formal description of M. jurutiensis and M. sabiniparaensis with the putative phylogenetic distinctness in two mitochondrial gene fragments, namely 16S (16S ribosomal RNA gene) and the barcoding gene COI (cytochrome c oxidase subunit I). The downsides of using only mtDNA to delineate species are widely known: mtDNA is uniparentally inherited, considered a single genetic locus, has the propensity to introgress across species borders and to transfer into the nuclear genome, has little use in detecting hybridization, and often yields topologies that do not represent species trees (Moore 1995;Toews & Brelsford 2012;Allendorf 2017;Hillis 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…While we agree that the genus deserves scientific attention and likely comprises additional unrecognized taxa (Ettmar 2019), the evidence presented in these two descriptions was neither strong nor robust, and the conclusions drawn from their extremely limited datasets were very weakly supported. Here, we point out the inconsistencies and methodological shortcomings of Cunha et al (2021Cunha et al ( , 2022 and discuss why M. jurutiensis and M. sabiniparaensis were described prematurely and should not be recognized until more robust and reliable data are presented to corroborate their validity. We specifically focus on phylogenetic and morphological evidence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations