2016
DOI: 10.1109/mra.2016.2580591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Soft Robot Control Method: Using Model Predictive Control for a Pneumatically Actuated Humanoid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide range of robotic continuum manipulators have been developed ranging from tendon‐driven manipulators installed on moving vehicles and others that behave as an octopus arm, pneumatically and vacuum‐driven continuum manipulators, vacuum‐driven continuum manipulators composed of stackable modules, fluidic elastomer manipulators, continuum actuators combining tendons and PAM actuators for combined position and stiffness control, and sPAMs‐driven continuum actuators . Other types of robotic arms have used jointed motions using either inflatable joints with a series of single degree‐of‐freedom (DOF) joints or PAMs to produce multi‐DOF joints capable of 3D positioning . It remains that the capability of jointed or continuum‐based robotic arms is directly dependent on the actuation capabilities of the soft actuator driving them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of robotic continuum manipulators have been developed ranging from tendon‐driven manipulators installed on moving vehicles and others that behave as an octopus arm, pneumatically and vacuum‐driven continuum manipulators, vacuum‐driven continuum manipulators composed of stackable modules, fluidic elastomer manipulators, continuum actuators combining tendons and PAM actuators for combined position and stiffness control, and sPAMs‐driven continuum actuators . Other types of robotic arms have used jointed motions using either inflatable joints with a series of single degree‐of‐freedom (DOF) joints or PAMs to produce multi‐DOF joints capable of 3D positioning . It remains that the capability of jointed or continuum‐based robotic arms is directly dependent on the actuation capabilities of the soft actuator driving them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the deformable nature of under-actuated soft robotics, they are dynamically formulated using a system of infinite dimensions [23,58,93,[118][119][120]. These designs are currently unable to be reduced to an exact model which often leads to rigid-body assumptions to create manageable dynamic equations [121]. Figure 10 below shows a McKibben muscle controlling a rigid body mechanism, allowing for the deformation of the actuator to be easily measured with rigid body dynamic equations [122].…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research that is most related to ours in terms of trying to control a robot to a specific configuration includes the use of inflatable links with cable tendons (Sanan et al, 2009(Sanan et al, , 2011, fluid drive elastomer (Marchese et al, 2014a,b;Marchese and Rus, 2015), or rotary elastic chamber actuators such as in Ivlev (2009) and Gaiser et al (2014). However, in addition to other differences with past soft robot control work that we outline more specifically in Best et al (2016), as far as we know they have not developed control for these robots based on learned empirical models like those that we present in this paper. This is true except for work in Thuruthel et al (2017) where they learn dynamic models similar to what we present.…”
Section: Soft Robot Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%