2016
DOI: 10.3934/naco.2016006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new smoothing approach to exact penalty functions for inequality constrained optimization problems

Abstract: In this study, we introduce a new smoothing approximation to the non-differentiable exact penalty functions for inequality constrained optimization problems. Error estimations are investigated between non-smooth penalty function and smoothed penalty function. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of proposed smoothing approach the numerical examples are given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From (25) and (26), we obtain S α R f −→ f pointwise, as α −→ +∞. Now, let us analyze the error estimates.…”
Section: Smoothing Approximations For One-dimensional Case Let Us Consider the Partitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From (25) and (26), we obtain S α R f −→ f pointwise, as α −→ +∞. Now, let us analyze the error estimates.…”
Section: Smoothing Approximations For One-dimensional Case Let Us Consider the Partitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, most of the exact penalty functions are not smooth. Therefore, many papers studied the smoothing approximations for these exact penalty functions [11,14,17,18,25]. As a result, smoothing techniques of P-S functions play a fundamental role in optimization and penalty methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to improve the smoothing approaches, different types of valuable techniques and algorithms are developed [11][12][13][14]. In recent years, the smoothing approaches have been used for many non-smooth problems such as minmax [15,16], exact penalty [17][18][19][20] and etc. [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , m. If q pi (t) = max{0, t} pi , then the function θ can be considered as penalty term in constrained optimization [34]. If q pi (t) = |t| pi , the function θ can be used as a regularization term in solving inverse problems [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 6 are presented in the Table 3. We consider the penalty approach in [34] to solve the problem given in (13) Table 3. The values of a j , b j and p j in Example 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%