2019
DOI: 10.3390/cells8121510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Sensitive Method for the Detection of Mycoplasmas Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Abstract: Contamination of cell cultures by mycoplasmas is a very common phenomenon. As they can substantially alter cell metabolism and potentially spread to all cell cultures in laboratory, their early detection is necessary. One of the fastest and cheapest methods of mycoplasma detection relies on the direct staining of mycoplasmas’ DNA by DAPI or Hoechst dyes. Although this method is easy and fast to perform, it suffers from the low signal provided by these dyes compared to the nuclear DNA. Therefore, the reporter c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most make use of DNA amplification techniques that are characterized as stable, specific, and rapid, such as general and real-time PCR assays [6,[19][20][21], Cycleave PCR [22], and loop-mediated isothermal amplification [23]. Some are based on immunological principles, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays [24,25], and some are based on microscopic techniques, including electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy [26][27][28]. Other detection methods include Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy [29], biochemical tests [30], and Gaussia luciferase-based assays [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most make use of DNA amplification techniques that are characterized as stable, specific, and rapid, such as general and real-time PCR assays [6,[19][20][21], Cycleave PCR [22], and loop-mediated isothermal amplification [23]. Some are based on immunological principles, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays [24,25], and some are based on microscopic techniques, including electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy [26][27][28]. Other detection methods include Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy [29], biochemical tests [30], and Gaussia luciferase-based assays [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cells were cultivated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO 2 . The cell line was regularly tested for mycoplasma contamination by PCR and enzymatic detection [ 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained data were analysed using CellProfiler [ 43 , 44 ], ImageJ and Microsoft Excel software and the final graphs were plotted in GraphPad Prism 6 [ 41 ]. The graphs were constructed using the following functions: one-phase decay was used in the case of the analysis of data in figure 2 a–c , one-phase association was used for the analysis of data in electronic supplementary material, figure S3, second-order polynomial (quadratic) regression was used for the analysis of the data in figures 1 b and 8 a – c (except m-sensors with T in 8 a , b ), and electronic supplementary material, figures S1, S2 (6-FAM/Cy5) and S5 (probe B 30FAM C UQ ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is as follows: the nucleus was stained with DAPI and observed under an oil microscope. Mycoplasma contamination is characterized by radiating or satellite-shaped spots around the nucleus (22). All cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Corning, Corning, NY, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Clark Bioscience, Richmond, VA, USA), penicillin (100 U/ ml), and streptomycin (100 mg/ml) (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C with 5% CO 2 .…”
Section: Cell Culturementioning
confidence: 99%