2016
DOI: 10.1137/15m1019271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A New Selection Operator for the Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method---Improved A Priori Error Bound and Extensions

Abstract: This paper introduces a new framework for constructing the Discrete Empirical Interpolation Method (DEIM) projection operator. The interpolation node selection procedure is formulated using the QR factorization with column pivoting, and it enjoys a sharper error bound for the DEIM projection error. Furthermore, for a subspace U given as the range of an orthonormal U, the DEIM projection does not change if U is replaced by UΩ with arbitrary unitary matrix Ω. In a large-scale setting, the new approach allows mod… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
278
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
278
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, it could be obtained, for example, by applying the standard DEIM point selection algorithm [6,Alg. 1] or by the recent variation [7].…”
Section: Masked Projection Let Y ∈ Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, it could be obtained, for example, by applying the standard DEIM point selection algorithm [6,Alg. 1] or by the recent variation [7].…”
Section: Masked Projection Let Y ∈ Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The off‐line cost of computing DEIM reduced Jacobian arises from the SVD of the nonlinear term snapshots ()scriptO(n·ns2), DEIM algorithm for selecting the interpolation points ()scriptO(m2·n+m3) , and matrix operations in ()scriptO(m3+n·m2+k2·m). No additional effort is needed in this stage in the case the DEIM method is employed to approximate the reduced nonlinear term too.…”
Section: Reduced Order Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by recent work by Drmač and Gugercin [11] on a modified DEIM-like algorithm for model reduction, we can improve this bound considerably.…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Bound For Deim-curmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 4.4 was inspired by the proof technique developed by Drmač and Gugercin [11] to bound (P T V) −1 , when P is selected by applying a pivoted rank-revealing QR factorization scheme to V. Note that this new bound is on the same order of magnitude as the Drmač-Gugercin scheme. In practice, their scheme seems to give slightly smaller growth that is more consistent over a wide range of examples.…”
Section: −1mentioning
confidence: 99%