2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new scheme for probabilistic forecasting with an ensemble model based on CEEMDAN and AM-MCMC and its application in precipitation forecasting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Projection of Water Supply and Demand-Related Indexes (1) Annual average precipitation The occurrence of annual precipitation events is random, which contributes to the difficulty in precipitation forecasting [77]. It is difficult to determine whether 2025 and 2030 will be wet years, normal years or dry years by some model forecasting methods, such as the ARIMA model.…”
Section: Classification Of the Evaluation Gradesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projection of Water Supply and Demand-Related Indexes (1) Annual average precipitation The occurrence of annual precipitation events is random, which contributes to the difficulty in precipitation forecasting [77]. It is difficult to determine whether 2025 and 2030 will be wet years, normal years or dry years by some model forecasting methods, such as the ARIMA model.…”
Section: Classification Of the Evaluation Gradesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the CEEMDAN-KRR and other comparative models by selecting the most relevant satellite variables, we optimise the overall predictive system using feature selections based on grey wolf optimisation (GWO), ant colony optimisation (ACO, [40]), atom search optimisation (ASO, [41]), and particle swarm optimisation (PSO) [42]. It is imperative to note that the CEEMDAN method is a variation of the Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) algorithm that provides a near-exact reconstruction of the original signal and a better spectral separation of the Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) [43]. Several other comparison approaches include CEEMDAN-MLR or Multiple Linear Regression, CEEMDAN-RF or Random Forest, and CEEMDAN-SVR or Support Vector Regression, and their respective standalone counterparts such as KRR, MLR, RF, and SVR models are also used in this study.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CEEMDAN-based decomposition, Gaussian white noise with a unit variance is added consecutively at each stage to reduce the forecasting procedure’s complexity (Di et al 2014 ). Over the last few years, CEEMDAN techniques have been successfully implemented in forecasting soil moisture (Ahmed et al 2021b ; Prasad et al 2018 , 2019a , b ), draught (Liu and Wang 2021 ), precipitation (Wang et al 2022 ), and wind energy (Liang et al 2020 ; Zhang et al 2017 ). However, a previous version (i.e., EEMD) was used in forecasting streamflow (Seo and Kim 2016 ) and rainfall (Beltrán-Castro et al 2013 ; Jiao et al 2016 ; Ouyang et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%