The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.01041.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new scenario for the evolutionary origin of hair, feather, and avian scales

Abstract: In zoology it is well known that birds are characterized by the presence of feathers, and mammals by hairs. Another common point of view is that avian scales are directly related to reptilian scales. As a skin embryologist, I have been fascinated by the problem of regionalization of skin appendages in amniotes throughout my scientific life. Here I have collected the arguments that result from classical experimental embryology, from the modern molecular biology era, and from the recent discovery of new fossils.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
107
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
(233 reference statements)
2
107
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, skin secretions or external deposits on feathers cannot account for our results. Birds did not evolve a glandular skin as in mammals (Dhouailly, 2009), but it is possible that hormone manipulation in our experiment could have resulted in increased CORT in preen oil (waxes), which then would have been deposited on feathers and elevated CORT f . However, previous experimental work has ruled out external deposits as the source of CORT in feathers [see appendixS1 in Bortolotti et al (Bortolotti et al, 2008)], and preen oil from starlings did not contain detectable levels of CORT (Lattin et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, skin secretions or external deposits on feathers cannot account for our results. Birds did not evolve a glandular skin as in mammals (Dhouailly, 2009), but it is possible that hormone manipulation in our experiment could have resulted in increased CORT in preen oil (waxes), which then would have been deposited on feathers and elevated CORT f . However, previous experimental work has ruled out external deposits as the source of CORT in feathers [see appendixS1 in Bortolotti et al (Bortolotti et al, 2008)], and preen oil from starlings did not contain detectable levels of CORT (Lattin et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slominski, 2005;Slominski et al, 2007), to our knowledge no studies have provided evidence of local production of glucocorticoids in bird skin (Taves et al, 2011). Without such evidence, the extrapolation of findings in mammals to the situation in birds may not be warranted because hair and feathers evolved independently in lineages separated by over 300million years of evolution (Dhouailly, 2009). All birds in our study were handled similarly, with the exception of treatments, and all treatments were applied within each nest box.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7A). Hairs and feathers are other skinderived appendages whose early development shares similarities with MP induction and invagination (58)(59)(60)(61). Of note, they also express different Hox gene combinations (32)(33)(34)62).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The function of other isoforms of p53 and p73 in epidermal morphogenesis has not been as well studied, but they may also play different roles or form heterotetramers with the isoforms of p63, leading to various types of tetramers with varying transactivation ability that induce a certain complement of target genes depending on spatial and temporal cues. The process of skin development results in the formation of a stratified epidermis with selfrenewing ability and a number of skin appendages (hair follicles, nails, glands) (Blanpain and Fuchs 2009;Chuong and Richardson 2009;Dhouailly 2009). The p63 transcription factor serves as a master regulator of epidermal development and differentiation ( Fig.…”
Section: The P53 Family and Its Isoformsmentioning
confidence: 99%