Abstract:In zoology it is well known that birds are characterized by the presence of feathers, and mammals by hairs. Another common point of view is that avian scales are directly related to reptilian scales. As a skin embryologist, I have been fascinated by the problem of regionalization of skin appendages in amniotes throughout my scientific life. Here I have collected the arguments that result from classical experimental embryology, from the modern molecular biology era, and from the recent discovery of new fossils.… Show more
“…Similarly, skin secretions or external deposits on feathers cannot account for our results. Birds did not evolve a glandular skin as in mammals (Dhouailly, 2009), but it is possible that hormone manipulation in our experiment could have resulted in increased CORT in preen oil (waxes), which then would have been deposited on feathers and elevated CORT f . However, previous experimental work has ruled out external deposits as the source of CORT in feathers [see appendixS1 in Bortolotti et al (Bortolotti et al, 2008)], and preen oil from starlings did not contain detectable levels of CORT (Lattin et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slominski, 2005;Slominski et al, 2007), to our knowledge no studies have provided evidence of local production of glucocorticoids in bird skin (Taves et al, 2011). Without such evidence, the extrapolation of findings in mammals to the situation in birds may not be warranted because hair and feathers evolved independently in lineages separated by over 300million years of evolution (Dhouailly, 2009). All birds in our study were handled similarly, with the exception of treatments, and all treatments were applied within each nest box.…”
SUMMARYIntegrated measures of corticosterone (CORT), such as from feathers (CORT f ), have intuitive appeal because they incorporate both the duration and amplitude of glucocorticoid secretion. An association between CORT f and plasma CORT has never been shown in wild birds, and it is unclear as to when and whether these measures should be correlated, given that they are fundamentally different yet related measures of physiology. We hypothesized that CORT f should correlate with instantaneous measurements of plasma CORT when the latter reflect sustained changes in the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. To test this, we experimentally manipulated levels of plasma CORT in wild nestling tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) using 5day time-release CORT pellets, and measured plasma CORT and growth parameters before, during and at the end of hormone manipulation (days 7, 9 and 11 post-hatch, respectively). CORT f and plasma CORT were significantly positively related only when the latter was at its highest and most variable among individuals (day 9). A similar relationship was expected at day 11, but plasma CORT had returned to near-original levels. Nestlings with higher CORT f were smaller, lighter and less likely to fledge, but we did not detect seasonal effects on CORT f . Our results clearly demonstrate that CORT f from free-living birds can reflect plasma CORT, but correlations may not always be expected, especially if elevations in plasma CORT are relatively modest and of short duration. Our work suggests that CORT f is best used to study the activity of the HPA axis over relatively long time frames and can be used effectively to advance avian ecology.
Supplementary material available online at
“…Similarly, skin secretions or external deposits on feathers cannot account for our results. Birds did not evolve a glandular skin as in mammals (Dhouailly, 2009), but it is possible that hormone manipulation in our experiment could have resulted in increased CORT in preen oil (waxes), which then would have been deposited on feathers and elevated CORT f . However, previous experimental work has ruled out external deposits as the source of CORT in feathers [see appendixS1 in Bortolotti et al (Bortolotti et al, 2008)], and preen oil from starlings did not contain detectable levels of CORT (Lattin et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slominski, 2005;Slominski et al, 2007), to our knowledge no studies have provided evidence of local production of glucocorticoids in bird skin (Taves et al, 2011). Without such evidence, the extrapolation of findings in mammals to the situation in birds may not be warranted because hair and feathers evolved independently in lineages separated by over 300million years of evolution (Dhouailly, 2009). All birds in our study were handled similarly, with the exception of treatments, and all treatments were applied within each nest box.…”
SUMMARYIntegrated measures of corticosterone (CORT), such as from feathers (CORT f ), have intuitive appeal because they incorporate both the duration and amplitude of glucocorticoid secretion. An association between CORT f and plasma CORT has never been shown in wild birds, and it is unclear as to when and whether these measures should be correlated, given that they are fundamentally different yet related measures of physiology. We hypothesized that CORT f should correlate with instantaneous measurements of plasma CORT when the latter reflect sustained changes in the activity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. To test this, we experimentally manipulated levels of plasma CORT in wild nestling tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) using 5day time-release CORT pellets, and measured plasma CORT and growth parameters before, during and at the end of hormone manipulation (days 7, 9 and 11 post-hatch, respectively). CORT f and plasma CORT were significantly positively related only when the latter was at its highest and most variable among individuals (day 9). A similar relationship was expected at day 11, but plasma CORT had returned to near-original levels. Nestlings with higher CORT f were smaller, lighter and less likely to fledge, but we did not detect seasonal effects on CORT f . Our results clearly demonstrate that CORT f from free-living birds can reflect plasma CORT, but correlations may not always be expected, especially if elevations in plasma CORT are relatively modest and of short duration. Our work suggests that CORT f is best used to study the activity of the HPA axis over relatively long time frames and can be used effectively to advance avian ecology.
Supplementary material available online at
“…7A). Hairs and feathers are other skinderived appendages whose early development shares similarities with MP induction and invagination (58)(59)(60)(61). Of note, they also express different Hox gene combinations (32)(33)(34)62).…”
Vertebrate Hox genes encode transcription factors operating during the development of multiple organs and structures. However, the evolutionary mechanism underlying this remarkable pleiotropy remains to be fully understood. Here, we show that Hoxd8 and Hoxd9, two genes of the HoxD complex, are transcribed during mammary bud (MB) development. However, unlike in other developmental contexts, their coexpression does not rely on the same regulatory mechanism. Hoxd8 is regulated by the combined activity of closely located sequences and the most distant telomeric gene desert. On the other hand, Hoxd9 is controlled by an enhancer-rich region that is also located within the telomeric gene desert but has no impact on Hoxd8 transcription, thus constituting an exception to the global regulatory logic systematically observed at this locus. The latter DNA region is also involved in Hoxd gene regulation in other contexts and strongly interacts with Hoxd9 in all tissues analyzed thus far, indicating that its regulatory activity was already operational before the appearance of mammary glands. Within this DNA region and neighboring a strong limb enhancer, we identified a short sequence conserved in therian mammals and capable of enhancer activity in the MBs. We propose that Hoxd gene regulation in embryonic MBs evolved by hijacking a preexisting regulatory landscape that was already at work before the emergence of mammals in structures such as the limbs or the intestinal tract.enhancers | TAD | mammalian development | mammary gland
“…The function of other isoforms of p53 and p73 in epidermal morphogenesis has not been as well studied, but they may also play different roles or form heterotetramers with the isoforms of p63, leading to various types of tetramers with varying transactivation ability that induce a certain complement of target genes depending on spatial and temporal cues. The process of skin development results in the formation of a stratified epidermis with selfrenewing ability and a number of skin appendages (hair follicles, nails, glands) (Blanpain and Fuchs 2009;Chuong and Richardson 2009;Dhouailly 2009). The p63 transcription factor serves as a master regulator of epidermal development and differentiation ( Fig.…”
Section: The P53 Family and Its Isoformsmentioning
Although p53 has long been known as the "guardian of the genome" with a role in tumor suppression in many tissues, the discovery of two p53 ancestral genes, p63 and p73, more than a decade ago has triggered a considerable amount of research into the role of these genes in skin development and diseases. In this review, we primarily focus on mechanisms of action of p53 and p63, which are the best-studied p53 family members in the skin. The existence of multiple isoforms and their roles as transcriptional activators and repressors are key to their function in multiple biological processes including the control of skin morphogenesis, regeneration, tumorigenesis, and response to chemotherapy. Last, we provide directions for further research on this family of genes in skin biology and pathology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.