1981
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(81)90493-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A new rectangular beam theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
157
0
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 465 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
157
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These theories extend from first-order shear deformation theories by Mindlin [10] and Yang, Norris and Stavsky [11] to higher-order Levinson-Reddy-type shear deformation models that enforce vanishing shear strains at the top and bottom surfaces in the displacement field a priori [12,13], and further to generalised higher-order theories that do not make this initial assumption and may account for transverse normal deformation, i.e. thickness stretching [14,15].…”
Section: Displacement-based Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These theories extend from first-order shear deformation theories by Mindlin [10] and Yang, Norris and Stavsky [11] to higher-order Levinson-Reddy-type shear deformation models that enforce vanishing shear strains at the top and bottom surfaces in the displacement field a priori [12,13], and further to generalised higher-order theories that do not make this initial assumption and may account for transverse normal deformation, i.e. thickness stretching [14,15].…”
Section: Displacement-based Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Levinson (1981) suggested a third-order rectangular beam model by taking the in-plane warping of cross section into account. Based on the same idea, Murthy (1981) used another definition of rotation, leading to the shear correction factor 5/6 rather than 2/3 by Levinson (1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Levinson (1981) suggested a third-order rectangular beam model by taking the in-plane warping of cross section into account. Based on the same idea, Murthy (1981) used another definition of rotation, leading to the shear correction factor 5/6 rather than 2/3 by Levinson (1981). Following the kinematics of Levinson (1981), Bickford (1982) proposed a variationally consistent beam theory and Reddy (1984aReddy ( , 1984b further developed a higher-order differential governing equation for plates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations